SOLUTION: Mr. Khaled assembles computer boards for an electronics company. He is paid on the following differential pay scale: Units produced Amount per unit 1 - 50 $ 5.00 51 - 160 $

Algebra ->  Test -> SOLUTION: Mr. Khaled assembles computer boards for an electronics company. He is paid on the following differential pay scale: Units produced Amount per unit 1 - 50 $ 5.00 51 - 160 $       Log On


   



Question 1179216: Mr. Khaled assembles computer boards for an electronics company. He is paid on the following differential pay scale:
Units produced Amount per unit
1 - 50 $ 5.00
51 - 160 $ 8.00
161 - 200 $ 12.00
Over 200 $ 15.00
If he made 250 boards in a week, how much is his gross pay?
(Round your answer to the nearest hundredth)

Found 2 solutions by MathLover1, ikleyn:
Answer by MathLover1(20849) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

If he made 250 boards in a week, he will be payed $15.00 per unit
$250%2A15.00=3750.00

Answer by ikleyn(52781) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.

I do not think that the problem is worded and formulated correctly.

I do not think so  BECAUSE  this formulation  CONTRADICTS  to the simplest  business/human  logic.


        Indeed,  if to interpret the condition  LITERALLY,  then

            - for  50  boards the worker is paid  5*50 = 250 dollars

            - for  51  boards the worker is paid  8*51 = 408 dollars.


It means that the business elementary  HUGELY  OVERPAYS  in this case,  which normal  (adequate)  business  WILL  NEVER  do.


The change,  which should be made in the formulation,  is  OBVIOUS,   but,
respecting the holy right of the problem composer,  I will leave it entirely for the composer's  care.



From the other side,  re-editing and re-formulation are absolutely necessary,  because in this form the problem is  NONSENSE.


After re-editing and reformulation,  the solution and the answer  BOTH  will be  TOTALLY  DIFFERENT.


Your understanding will be different,     TOO.


/////////////


Hello,  although I issued my critics about the problem formulation,  you,   the visitor,
should understand that I play on your side.


Therefore,  I ask you do not post anathema to me for pointing deficiencies in your post.


You will do it much better,  if you will post your  "THANKS"  to me for my explanations.