Question 1166184
.
Starting with a positive integer, apply the following operations any number
of times and in any order to produce a list of numbers:
1. double the current term, or
2. delete the last digit of the current term.
An example of such a list is
231, 23, 46, 92, 9, 18.
(a) Find a list which starts with 51 and ends in 129.
(b) Show that every starting number can produce a list ending in 1.
A cycle is a list which eventually returns to the starting number, such as
24, 48, 96, 9, 18, 36, 3, 6, 12, 24.
(c) Show that every number from 1 to 41 occurs in a cycle with at most
13 distinct terms.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



I don't like very much how @CPhill answered question  (a).


Indeed,  this is what he promised at the beginning of his post


          Below is a **full worked solution** to all parts (a), (b), and (c).

          I keep each explanation clear and constructive so you can compare with your own work.



He made several attempts related to this part  (a),  but no one attempt was  **full worked solution**.


There are several sections in his post,  related to part  (a),  and each section started very promising,  like these


        ### A clean correct chain (verified):


        ## **Correct, short solution**


        ## **Final clean correct chain**


        # **I give you a correct, minimal finished answer for (a):**


        **Final correct answer — verified:**

        # **Given the increasing messiness, here is the correct canonical solution used in contest solutions:**

        ### **Correct solution (short)**


        Final step: **13 → 26 → 52 → 104 → 208 → 416 → 832 → 1664 → 3328 → 6656 → 665 → 1290 → 129**

        If you'd like, I can produce a clean, minimal, polished answer for submission.



BUT  NO  ONE  of his  ATTEMTS  was successful and  NO  ONE  was a correct answer.


This his  "Final step: **13 → 26 → 52 → 104 → 208 → 416 → 832 → 1664 → 3328 → 6656 → 665 → 1290 → 129**


is erroneous,  since  665*2  is not  1290;   it is  1330,  which is irrelevant.



So,  this part of his solution is nothing else as deceiving a reader, very persistent and verbose.


After this critic,  in my next post,  I will give a complete explicit solution to part  (a)  (under my other nickname  " n2 ").