Question 1170522
<pre>
As we see, AI is getting better.  One day it'll beat us all.  I read that it has
been a long time since a human master chess champion was able to beat an AI
computer program programmed to learn from its mistakes. 

I just asked AI about that, and got this answer:

AI:
The last time a human world chess champion was able to beat a chess program
designed to learn from its mistakes in a formal match was in 1996, during the
first match between Garry Kasparov and IBM's Deep Blue.

In that match:

Kasparov lost the first game but ultimately won the six-game match 4  -  2. This
victory demonstrated that, while computers were becoming formidable opponents,
humans could still prevail at the highest level of chess.

However, the following year, in 1997, Deep Blue was upgraded and defeated
Kasparov in a highly publicized rematch with a score of 3.5  -  2.5. This marked the
first time a reigning world champion lost a match to a computer under standard
tournament conditions.

Since then, chess engines have continued to improve dramatically, with modern
programs like Stockfish, AlphaZero, and Leela Chess Zero outperforming even the
strongest human players. Today, no human can consistently defeat top chess
engines, which are now considered far superior in both calculation and strategic
understanding.

EM
My question now is: When are we humans going to stop electing selfish multi-
billionaire humans as presidents of countries, as in the present USA, and start
electing AI?

Edwin</pre>