Question 1064963
.
In Math (in the Number Theory especially), when people talk about the number of divisors of the given number, 1 (unit ONE) is ALWAYS 
considered as a divisor, and is counted ONE time.


See, for example, this link
<A HREF=http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/xpage/tau.html>http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/xpage/tau.html</A>


http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/xpage/tau.html



The solution of the problem was done by me under this link 

<A HREF=https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Rate-of-work-word-problems/Rate-of-work-word-problems.faq.question.1064533.html>https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Rate-of-work-word-problems/Rate-of-work-word-problems.faq.question.1064533.html</A>


https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Rate-of-work-word-problems/Rate-of-work-word-problems.faq.question.1064533.html


For your convenience I copy and past it here again:


--------------------------
<pre>
If the number has exactly 3 factors, it means that the number is the square of a prime number: N = {{{p^2}}}.

Then it has the factors 1 (one), p and {{{p^2}}}.


Indeed, if the number is a prime number, it has only TWO factors: 1 (one) and itself.

If the number is not prime and is not the square of a prime, then it has more than 3 factors.


Therefore, to answer the problem's question, we must take the square of the largest two-digit prime number, which is {{{97^2}}} = 9409.


<U>Answer</U>. The number under the question is 9409.
</pre>

Solved.
--------------------------


When Alan tries to argue with me, he simply demonstrates that he is not familiar with the subject.



-----------------------
Next is my notice to the person who posted it for the second time.


As I just said it was posted before, and solved and answered.
Now this request was repeated.


I am very sad that you can not recognize the correct solution which was developed and explained to you.
-----------------------


If you ARE NOT that person who posted it for the first time,
then simply IGNORE this notice. It is not to you . . .