Question 663432
<font face="Times New Roman" size="+2">


He didn't add 1 inside of both sets of parentheses, unless he just made a mistake that is.  However, the 36 term added to the RHS tells me otherwise.


What he is doing is completing the square on each of the variables.  The goal, when you have a general form equation of an ellipse like this is to convert it to the standard form, namely:  *[tex \LARGE \frac{(x\ -\ h)^2}{a^2}\ +\ \frac{(y\ -\ k)^2}{b^2}\ =\ 1] which is a ellipse centered at *[tex \LARGE (h,\,k)] with semi-major and semi-minor axes *[tex \LARGE a] and *[tex \LARGE b] (the major axis is larger).


To perform this conversion, we have to complete the square.


Step 1:  Move the constant term into the RHS:


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3x^2\ +\ 4y^2\ -\ 6x\ -\ 24y\ =\ -39]


Step 2:  Put the *[tex \LARGE x] terms together and the *[tex \LARGE y] terms together


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3x^2\ -\ 6x\ +\ 4y^2\ -\ 24y\ =\ -39]


Step 3:  Factor the coefficient on the *[tex \LARGE x^2] term out of the *[tex \LARGE x] terms, leaving a spot inside the parentheses, then do the same thing for the *[tex \LARGE y] terms:


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\left(x^2\ -\ 2x\ +\ ??\right)\ +\ 4\left(y^2\ -\ 6y\ +\ ??\right)\ =\ -\ 39]


Step 4: Complete the square on *[tex \LARGE x].  Divide the coefficient on *[tex \LARGE x] by 2, and square the result.  -2 divided by 2 is -1, -1 squared is 1, and therefore 1 is the number that needs to be added inside of the parentheses.  Note that the 3 coefficient on the outside of the parentheses means that you are actually adding 3 to the LHS when you insert a 1 into the set of parentheses containing the *[tex \LARGE x] term.  Hence you have to compensate by adding 3 to the RHS.


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\left(x^2\ -\ 2x\ +\ 1\right)\ +\ 4\left(y^2\ -\ 6y\ +\ ??\right)\ =\ -\ 39\ +\ 3]


Step 5: Do the *[tex \LARGE y] part.  -6 divided by 2 is -3.  -3 squared is 9. 9 inside the parentheses and 9 times 4 = 36 in the RHS:


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\left(x^2\ -\ 2x\ +\ 1\right)\ +\ 4\left(y^2\ -\ 6y\ +\ 9\right)\ =\ -\ 39\ +\ 3\ +\ 36]


Step 6:


Factor the expressions in the parentheticals, which should be easy to do because we arranged for them to be perfect squares.  Also collect terms in the RHS.


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\left(x\ -\ 1\right)^2\ +\ 4\left(y\ -\ 3\right)^2\ =\ 0]


Step 7:


Gaack!  The RHS is zero!  We won't have an ellipse, we will have a point.  Be that as it may, your RHS might not be zero next time.  Proceed:


Ordinarily you would divide by the simplified RHS to produce a 1 in the RHS, but that is not to be in this case. Divide by the LCM of the coefficients on the parenthetical expressions:


*[tex \LARGE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \frac{\left(x\ -\ 1\right)^2}{4}\ +\ \frac{\left(y\ -\ 3\right)^2}{3}\ =\ 0]


And enjoy your graph of a point.  By the way:  Super Double WoWWie Extra Credit.  What are the coordinates of that point?


Step 8:  Don't doze off in class any more.


John
*[tex \LARGE e^{i\pi}\ +\ 1\ =\ 0]
My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it
<div style="text-align:center"><a href="http://outcampaign.org/" target="_blank"><img src="http://cdn.cloudfiles.mosso.com/c116811/scarlet_A.png" border="0" alt="The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism" width="143" height="122" /></a></div>
</font>