Question 540310
You are given to solve for x:
.
{{{4^(x+4)=5^(2x+5)}}}
.
Any time you have an unknown in the exponent, one of the things you should think of is using logarithms. Logarithms have a very useful property for such problems. .
Let's take the logarithm of both sides. We'll use logarithms to the base 10, but we could use natural logs as well. Taking the logarithm of both sides results in:
.
{{{log(10,4^(x+4)) = log(10,5^(2x+5))}}}
.
A useful property of logarithms is that exponents can be brought out as the multiplier of the logarithm operator. Bringing these two logarithms out as multipliers results in the equation becoming:
.
{{{(x + 4)*log(10,4) = (2x + 5)*log(10,5)}}}
.
Note that {{{log(10,4)}}} is just a number that you can get from a scientific calculator. Enter 4 and press the "log" key. To six decimal places you should see the answer of 0.602056. [This is the exponent you raise the base 10 to that will give you 4.]
.
Similarly {{{log(10,5)}}} is also just a number. Use your calculator to finds its value. You should get (to six decimal places) 0.698970. [This is the exponent you raise the base 10 to that will give you 5.]
.
Substitute these two values into the log equation to get:
.
{{{(x + 4)*(0.602056) = (2x + 5)*(0.698970)}}}
.
From here on out, its a fairly straightforward algebra problem.
.
Do the distributed multiplication on the left side by multiplying 0.602056 times each of the two terms in the parentheses to make the left side become as shown below:
.
{{{0.602056x + 4*0.602056 = (2x + 5)*(0.698970)}}}
.
The 4 times 0.602056 multiplies out to 2.408224 and the equation simplifies to:
.
{{{0.602056x + 2.408224 = (2x + 5)*(0.698970)}}}
.
Next, follow the same procedure of distributed multiplication on the right side. Multiply 0.698970 times each of the two terms in parentheses to get:
.
{{{0.602056x + 2.408224 = 1.397940x + 3.494850}}}
.
Move the constant from the left side by subtracting 2.408224 from both sides. (On the right side the 3.494850 has 2.408224 subtracted from it.) The equation then is simplified to:
.
{{{0.602056x = 1.397940x + 1.086626}}}
.
Then transfer the 1.397940x from the right side to the left side by subtracting 1.397940x from both sides. The equation becomes:
.
{{{-0.795884x = 1.086626}}}
.
Solve for x by dividing both sides by -0.795884 to get:
.
{{{x = 1.086626/-0.705584}}}
.
and this equals:
.
{{{x = -1.365607}}}
.
Let's try this in the original problem to see if it checks.
.
Start with:
.
{{{4^(x+4)=5^(2x+5)}}}
.
Substitute -1.365607 for x:
.
{{{4^(-1.365607+4) = 5^(2*-1.365607+5)}}}
.
Algebraically simplify the two exponents:
.
{{{4^(2.634393) = 5^(-2.731214+5)}}}
.
The exponent on the right side sums to give:
.
{{{4^(2.634393) = 5^(2.268786)}}}
.
Use a scientific calculator with an {{{x^y}}} function key to find the following simplifications to each side of this equation:
.
{{{38.553395=38.531273}}}
.
Pretty close to equal on both sides. The round off errors of the logarithms cause some differences. And I could have made some fat-fingered keying errors on the calculator also. Check my work. This near equality tells us that the value of x is accurate within a "reasonable" amount.
.
[A little closer value of x (by carrying more decimal places on a calculator) is x = -1.36529380395]
.
The process of bringing exponents outside of logarithms as multipliers is correct. Hope you can translate this discussion into an understanding of how you can handle exponents in which a variable appears.
.