Question 296143
The weight itself shouldn't be a factor.

The <i>academic</i> answer would be 7 * 24 = 168 miles. <br>
Having said that, that would be under ideal conditions.
Realistically speaking there are a <b>vast</b> number of variables to consider.
First, it's not likely that any stream or river is going to run at a constant 7 mph for that distance. It will slow as the stream widens and speed up as it narrows.<br>
Is it in a coastal area where a part of the journey could be affected by tide?<br>
Next was the body totally submerged, or was it floating in such a manner that wind and/or waves would have affected it? I think that wind and tide are the only natural forces that could make it go farther than the calculated 168 miles.<br>
Last, and most certainly not of least importance: <b>if</b> the body drug along the ground, got caught in debris, rocks or an eddy, those things would all slow it's progress.<br>
Knowing no more than I do about the conditions, if someone held a gun to my head & <b>forced</b> me to bet, I'd say that the body entered the water <i>considerably</i> closer than the 168 mile point.
I really don't know if I've helped you very much, but I <i>hope</i> I did.