SOLUTION: I've compared them to every rule and they don't make sense to me. INSTRUCTIONS: Determine whether the following symbolized arguments are valid or invalid by identifying the for

Algebra ->  Conjunction -> SOLUTION: I've compared them to every rule and they don't make sense to me. INSTRUCTIONS: Determine whether the following symbolized arguments are valid or invalid by identifying the for      Log On


   

Question 975440: I've compared them to every rule and they don't make sense to me.
INSTRUCTIONS: Determine whether the following symbolized arguments are valid or invalid by identifying the form of each. In some cases the argument must be rewritten using double negation or commutativity before it has a named form. Those arguments without a specific name are invalid.
∼S
∼S ⊃ FF

MP--valid.

AC--valid.

MT--valid.

AC--invalid.

DS--valid.
Answer by solver91311(24713) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!


Your argument is just a couple of premises without a conclusion. It has no validity because it is incomplete. Had you concluded FF from ~S and ~S -> FF, then you would have a valid conclusion by Modus Ponens.

John

My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it