Premises:
1.) V->H
2.) ~V->S
3.) ~H -> ~S
Conclusion:
/H
4. ~~S->~~H contrapositive, 3
5. S->H double negation, 4
6. ~V->H hypothetical syllogism 2,5
7. ~H->~~V contrapositive, 6
8. ~H->V double negation, 7
9. ~H->~V contrapositive, 1
10. V or ~V tautology
11. H or H constructive dilemma, 1,6,10
Here's an explanation of step 11:
constructive dilemma says: p->q,r->s,(p or r), / (q or s)
we substitute p=V, q=H, r=~V, s=H
V->H,~V->H,(V or ~V), / (H or H)
1, 6, 10, / 11
12. H simplification (or idempotent), 11
Edwin