SOLUTION: I have these two problems. Can anyone help please? 6 5/9 - 9 3/4 + 7 1/3 - 1 5/6 3 3/5 x 1 5/9 2/10 Thank you

Algebra ->  Numeric Fractions Calculators, Lesson and Practice -> SOLUTION: I have these two problems. Can anyone help please? 6 5/9 - 9 3/4 + 7 1/3 - 1 5/6 3 3/5 x 1 5/9 2/10 Thank you      Log On


   



Question 845926: I have these two problems. Can anyone help please?
6 5/9 - 9 3/4 + 7 1/3 - 1 5/6
3 3/5 x 1 5/9
2/10
Thank you

Answer by KMST(5328) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Solved by pluggable solver: SOLVE linear system by SUBSTITUTION
Solve:
+system%28+%0D%0A++++1%5Cx+%2B+1%5Cy+=+2%2C%0D%0A++++1%5Cx+%2B+-1%5Cy+=+0+%29%0D%0A++We'll use substitution. After moving 1*y to the right, we get:
1%2Ax+=+2+-+1%2Ay, or x+=+2%2F1+-+1%2Ay%2F1. Substitute that
into another equation:
1%2A%282%2F1+-+1%2Ay%2F1%29+%2B+-1%5Cy+=+0 and simplify: So, we know that y=1. Since x+=+2%2F1+-+1%2Ay%2F1, x=1.

Answer: system%28+x=1%2C+y=1+%29.
I am not sure that your problems are displayed correctly, but I will make my best guess at what you meant.
Not knowing your age, your grade, or how much math you have already learned, I do not know how much explanation you need.
Just in case, I will explain a lot, so it may get slow and boring.


To calculate 6%265%2F9-9%263%2F4%2B7%261%2F3-1%265%2F6 ,
the first step would be to convert those mixed numbers into improper fractions.
6%265%2F9=6%2B5%2F9=54%2F9%2B5%2F9=59%2F9 so the mixed number 6%265%2F9 can be written as the improper fraction 59%2F9 .
Doing the same with the other numbers,we get
6%265%2F9-9%263%2F4%2B7%261%2F3-1%265%2F6=59%2F9-39%2F4%2B22%2F3-11%2F6
Now the problem is that all the fractions to be added have different denominators.
We need a common denominator, one that is a multiple of all the denominators in those fractions.
We need a number that is a multiple of 9 , 4 , 3 and 6 .
The smallest one we can find is 36=4%2A9.
The multiples of 9 are 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, and so on.
Of the multiples of 9 ,
9 is a multiple of 3 , but not a multiple of the other numbers;
18 is a multiple of 3 and 6 , but not a multiple of 4 ,
and 27 is not a multiple of 4 or 6 either.
The next smallest multiple of 9 is 36 , and it is a multiple of 9 , 4 , 3 and 6 .
That is the least common multiple of 9 , 4 , 3 and 6 .
So we want to convert all those fractions to fractions with 36 for a denominator.
To convert a fraction into an equivalent fraction, we have to multiply the numerator and denominator times the same number.
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of 59%2F9 times 4 we get
59%2F9=59%2A4%2F%289%2A4%29=236%2F36 .
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of 39%2F4 times 9 we get
39%2F4=39%2A9%2F%284%2A9%29=351%2F36 .
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of 22%2F3 times 12 we get
22%2F3=22%2A12%2F%283%2A12%29=264%2F36 .
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of 11%2F6 times 6 we get
11%2F6=11%2A6%2F%286%2A6%29=66%2F36 .
So far we have

Now it is just a question of adding/subtracting the numerators to get
%28236-351%2B264-66%29%2F36=83%2F36
The way I calculate 236-351%2B264-66 has 3 steps:
1) I add together all the numbers with a + sign in front, and add together all the numbers with a - sign in front,
2) I figure out which total wins, to use the sign of the winning total, and
3) I calculate the difference of the totals.
I could write that as
236-351%2B264-66=%28236%2B264%29-%28351%2B66%29=500-417=83
Putting all of the above together, I would just write

(The rest of my calculations would be in my head, or on the margin of the paper, or on separate scrap paper).
83%2F26 cannot be simplified into an equivalent fraction with a denominator smaller than 36,
so the last step I could do is converting that 83%2F36 improper fraction into the mixed number 2%2611%2F36 .
I would do that in my head (or pretend I did), but my calculation would be
that 83 divided by 36 is 2 with a remainder of 11 ,
because 36 times 2 is 72 ,
and 83 is 83-72=11 more than 72 ,
so 83%2F36=%2872%2B11%29%2F36=72%2F36%2B11%2F36=2%2B11%2F36=2%2611%2F36 .
On my paper, I would only write
,
although a lot of calculating went into that.

I believe your second problem is 3%263%2F5 x 1%265%2F9 divided by 2%2F10 .
I would write that as

To begin with, 2%2F10=1%2F5 . It is strange that it was given as 2%2F10 ,
because 2%2F10 is the same as 1%2F5 and 1%2F5 is the simplest way to write that number.
You must also know that dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying times its reciprocal (the fraction turned upside down), so dividing by 1%2F5 is the same as multiplying by the fraction 5%2F1 , which is a fancy way of writing 5.
The final 18%2A14%2A5%2F%285%2A9%29=28 calculation can be done with a calculator,
but it is easy to do in my head if I simplify (cancel out) factors that appear in numerator and denominator.
In my head I see it like this:
.
Some teachers do not like to see cross-out cancelling,
because sometimes students go cross-out crazy,
and they cross out numbers here and there without rhyme or reason,
ending with a result that is not equal to what they started with.
They think that it should be written as
,
That shows that the two 5s cancel out because they can be rearranged into a factor that equals 1 , and multiplying times 1 does not change anything.