SOLUTION: I am having a bit of trouble with what I think is a fairly basic equation. -4ab*1/2ba^2 (no brackets) I am treating ab^2 as axaxbxb so getting the answer -2ab^3. The automatic f

Algebra ->  Equations -> SOLUTION: I am having a bit of trouble with what I think is a fairly basic equation. -4ab*1/2ba^2 (no brackets) I am treating ab^2 as axaxbxb so getting the answer -2ab^3. The automatic f      Log On


   



Question 798861: I am having a bit of trouble with what I think is a fairly basic equation. -4ab*1/2ba^2 (no brackets)
I am treating ab^2 as axaxbxb so getting the answer -2ab^3. The automatic formula solvers tell me it's actually -2a^3b^2 which I can only assume is because they're attributing the ^2 to a and not b.
I am confused.
Please help!
Thank you
Jordan

Answer by KMST(5328) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
ab%5E2=a%2Ab%2Ab and
There is no way ab^2=ab%5E2 could be interpreted as a%2Aa%2Ab%2Ab.
Without brackets, the ^2 applies only to the variable or number right before it. That would include more than one character only if those characters are forming a single variable or a single number such as the square of the length of segment AB written as AB^2, or the square of 13 written as 13^2=169.

I like to use brackets when there could be any doubt.
Some could interpret -4ab*1/2ba^2 as -4ab1%2F%28%222+b%22+a%5E2%29=-4ab%2A1%2F2ba%5E2.
If I meant that, I would write it as -4ab*1/(2ba^2).


I would interpret -4ab*1/2ba^2 as
-4 times a, times b, times 1, divided by 2, times b, and times a%5E2
-4ab%2A1 ÷ {{2*ba^2=-4ab*1/2}}}ba%5E2
The same could be written as
-4ab1%2F2ba%5E2=-4ab%281%2F2%29ba%5E2=-4ab%2A0.5ba%5E2=-4%2A0.5%2Aa%2Aa%5E2%2Ab%2Ab=-2a%5E3b%5E2

I would interpret -4ab*1/2ab^2 as
-4 times a, times b, times 1, divided by 2, times b, and times a%5E2
-4ab%2A1÷2%2Aab%5E2=-4ab%2A1%2F2ab%5E2
The same could be written as
-4ab1%2F2ab%5E2+=-4ab%281%2F2%29ab%5E2=-4ab%2A0.5ab%5E2=-4%2A0.5%2Aa%2Aa%2Ab%2Ab%5E2=-2a%5E2b%5E3