SOLUTION: Use the factor theorem to show that if 2^p - 1, where p does not equal 3, is a prime number, then p is neither divisible by 4 nor divisible by 3. (Alternatively, prove that if p is

Algebra ->  Logarithm Solvers, Trainers and Word Problems -> SOLUTION: Use the factor theorem to show that if 2^p - 1, where p does not equal 3, is a prime number, then p is neither divisible by 4 nor divisible by 3. (Alternatively, prove that if p is      Log On


   



Question 77052: Use the factor theorem to show that if 2^p - 1, where p does not equal 3, is a prime number, then p is neither divisible by 4 nor divisible by 3. (Alternatively, prove that if p is divisible by 4 or 3, then 2^p - 1 is divisible by some number other than positive/negative itself or positive/negative 1.)
Answer by Edwin McCravy(20055) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
We use the factor theorem, which is the identity: 
x%5En+-+y%5En+=+%28x+-+y%29(x%5E%28n-1%29%2Bx%5E%28n-2%29y%2Bx%5E%28n-3%29y%5E2+ ··· + x%5E%28n-k%29y%5E%28k-1%29+ + ··· + +xy%5E%28n-2%29%2By%5E%28n-1%29+)
Suppose p is divisible by 4, then there exists 
positive integer q such that p=4q, then 
2%5Ep-1+=+2%284q%29-1+=+%282%5E4%29%5Eq-1+=+16%5Eq-1 =
%2816+-+1%29(16%5E%28q-1%29%2B16%5E%28q-2%29%2B16%5E%28q-3%29%29+ ··· + 16%5E%28q-k%29 + ··· + 16+%2B+1) =
15(16%5E%28q-1%29%2B16%5E%28q-2%29%2B16%5E%28q-3%29%29+ ··· + 16%5E%28q-k%29 + ··· + 16+%2B+1) so 
2%5Ep-1 is either 15 (when q=1) or divisible 
by 15, and in either case is not prime.

For the case when p is divisible by 3, then there exists 
positive integer q such that p=3q. Do the same as
above and you have 7 where the 15 is above and 2%5Ep-1
is not prime unless it equals 7, i.e., unless q=1, i.e.,
unless p=3, but that is ruled out in the hypothesis.
Edwin