SOLUTION: My question about when do you use substitution an here's the equation x=y-6 2x=y+9 . My poster but I have to reword it differently my teacher said . Substitution y-6=y+9 Solv

Algebra ->  Test -> SOLUTION: My question about when do you use substitution an here's the equation x=y-6 2x=y+9 . My poster but I have to reword it differently my teacher said . Substitution y-6=y+9 Solv      Log On


   



Question 728761: My question about when do you use substitution an here's the equation x=y-6
2x=y+9 .
My poster but I have to reword it differently my teacher said .
Substitution y-6=y+9
Solve the equation is that right and good enough ?

Answer by solver91311(24713) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!


The short answer to the question you posed is "no and no". It is not right, and even if it were right, it would not be "good enough".

I presume that at this point you want to know why.

The word substitution, in any mathematical context, means to take something and replace it with something else that has exactly the same value. Not almost, not "sorta-kinda", but exactly. How do we know that things have exactly the same value? They have an equals sign between them. In fact, you will never be wrong to read as either: "Phi is equal to w plus 1" or "Phi has exactly the same value as w plus 1".

Having said all of that, let's go back and examine your problem. You started with:





Let's first read the first of these two equations using our new interpretation of the equals sign:

"x has exactly the same value as y minus 6"

Now if we go back to the meaning of substitution in this context, we know that, within the system of equations with which we are dealing, we can, anytime we find it convenient, write in place of or vice versa.

But what did you do? You replaced with . What's the matter with that? Go back to the definition of substitution. The thing substituted has to be exactly equal. But if is equal to as asserted by the first equation, then cannot, in general, be equal to , and therefore the substitution you made is incorrect.

Here it is correctly done:



Now, the above is "right" as far as it goes, but not "good enough"; you still have to solve it for . Meaning that you have to end up, by appropriate algebraic manipulations with an expression that looks like {some number}. I leave that part to you. I also leave to you to convince yourself that putting the expression into parentheses was the correct thing to do.

Having done all of that, there is still a couple of more steps. Once you know the value of because you got to {some number}, you have to take that {some number} and substitute it for in either of your original equations and solve what remains for the value of . Once you know and , you can report your solution set as the set containing the single element comprised of the the ordered pair . Your answer should look like:



with the correct numbers in the place of and of course.

John

Egw to Beta kai to Sigma
My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it
The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism