| 
 
 
| Question 51105:  Hello!
 Here's my question:
 In triangle KLM, P is the midpoint of the line segment LM.
 Prove that if PL = PK = PM, angle LKM = 90 degrees.
 I have been struggling on this question for quite some time now. All I found out from the web is to introduce a point O so that KPO is a line segment with P at the midpoint, and then show that KLOM is a rectangle.
 Please Help! Thank You!
 Found 2 solutions by  Earlsdon, Thanenjayan:
 Answer by Earlsdon(6294)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! I'm not certain that the following constitutes a "proof" in the formal sense of the word, but it certainly provides a demonstration. If you accept the principle that "An angle inscribed in a semi-circle is a right angle", then read the following:
 The line segment LM is the diameter of a circle.
 The mid-point of LM is therefore the center of this circle and PL and PM are both radii of this circle and they, of course, are equal.
 Point K is a point on the circumference of the circle, not coincident with either L or M.
 The segment PK is also a radius of the circle, so that:
 PL = PK = PM
 Segments KL and KM form the other two sides of a triangle.
 The angle LKM is inscribed in a semi-circle and is, therefore, a right angle. A right angle = 90 degrees.
 
 
Answer by Thanenjayan(7)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! a good question! you have the triangle KLM,where p is the midpoint of segment LM.
 and PL=PK=PM,
 So you can two isocele  triangles named PKL and PKM where Pk=PL=PM
 in the isocele  triangle PKL
 angle PKL = angle PLK  ( PK = PL)
 
 in the isocele  triangle PKM
 angle PKM = angle PMK ( PK =PM)
 so in the triangle KLM
 angles    MLK+LKM+KML  = 180 (addition of interior angles of triangle)
 angles    PLK+PKL+PKM+PMK = 180 ( same angles& LKM= PKL+PKM)
 so
 angles    2PKL+2PKM = 180 (angle PKL = angle PLK  and angle PKM = angle PMK, proved)
 
 2(PKL+PKM)= 180
 PKL+PKM = 90
 so       LKM    = 90   (proved)
 Q.E.D
 Note- for geometric proves, you must draw the figures, so that U easily understand the prove
 U 2nd quation is can not be varified, as we don't know the length of  line segment po.
 
 | 
  
 | 
 |