|
Question 409982: In solving the equation (x + 1)(x – 2) = 54, Eric stated that the solution would be
x + 1 = 54 => x = 53
or
(x – 2) = 54 => x = 56
However, at least one of these solutions fails to work when substituted back into the original equation. Why is that? Please help Eric to understand better; solve the problem yourself, and explain your reasoning.
I have tried this, when I substituted 53, and 56..I got 2862=54..I am way off..Please help..Thank you.
Found 3 solutions by richard1234, ewatrrr, stanbon: Answer by richard1234(7193) (Show Source): Answer by ewatrrr(24785) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Hi
(x + 1)(x – 2) = 54
This equation states it is the PRODUCT of (x+1) and (x-2) = 54!
Note: The factor theorem states that a polynomial f(x) has a factor (x − k)
where k is a 'solution' if and only if f(k) = 0
(x + 1)(x – 2) = 54 |Putting this in the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 in order to factor
x^2 -x - 2 = 54
x^2 -x - 56 = 0 |Yes!
factoring
(x-8)(x+7)= 0 |NOW! 'Each' of the Products is = 0
(x-8)= 0 x = 8
(x+7)= 0 x = -7
CHECKING our Answer(s)***
(x + 1)(x – 2) = 54
9*6 = 54
-6*-9 =54
Answer by stanbon(75887) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! In solving the equation (x + 1)(x – 2) = 54, Eric stated that the solution would be
x + 1 = 54 => x = 53
or
(x – 2) = 54 => x = 56
However, at least one of these solutions fails to work when substituted back into the original equation. Why is that? Please help Eric to understand better; solve the problem yourself, and explain your reasoning.
----------
We are told that (x+1)(x-2) = 54.
If x+1=54 then x-2 would have to equal 1 so the product could be 54
--
Then x would have to be 53 and x would have to be 3 at the same time.
---
But that is impossible.
------------------------------
Your substitution reveals the contradiction very well.
------------------------------
Cheers,
Stan H.
=========
|
|
|
| |