|  | 
| 
 
 
| Question 404197:  The square root of x raised to the 3rd power divided by the square root of 12
 Answer by jsmallt9(3758)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!  While there are other ways, the way I like to simplify radical over radical fractions is:
 Use a property of radicals,  , to rewrite the fraction of radicals into the radical of a fraction.Reduce the fraction inside the radical, if possible.Multiply the numerator and denominator of the fraction by the same expression so that the denominator a power of the type of root. (Since you have square roots we will be making the denominator a perfect square. If they had been cube roots, we would make the denominator a perfect cube. If they had been 4th roots, etc.)Use the  property again, this time from right to left, to rewrite the radical of a fraction as a fraction of radicals.Simplify the two radicals. If step 3 was done correctly then the radical in the denominator should disappear.
 Let's see this in action.
 1) Use the property to combine the radicals:
 
  2) Reduce the fraction inside the radical, if possible.
 This fraction,
  , will not reduce. 3) Multiply the numerator and denominator so that the denominator inside the radical becomes a power of the type of root.
 In this expression we will make the denominator into a perfect square. The obvious choice would be to multiply the numerator and denominator by 12. But we can do better: Multiplying the numerator and denominator by 3. This will make the denominator a 36 which is a perfect square. The lower perfect square saves us from extra simplifying later on.
 
  giving us:
 
  4) Use the property to split the radicals:
 
  5) Simplify the radicals.
 The denominator, being the square root of a perfect square, simplifies to a nice whole number. The numerator is not a perfect square. But it does have a perfect square factor:
 
  
  
  
  This is the simplified answer.
 
 When we were making the denominator a perfect square we turned it into a 36. If we had used the more obvious choice, here is how it would have worked out:
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  We get the same answer. But did you notice the extra simplifying?
 | 
  
 | 
 |  |  |