SOLUTION: 10^(2-5x)=793 please solve without a calculator

Algebra ->  Logarithm Solvers, Trainers and Word Problems -> SOLUTION: 10^(2-5x)=793 please solve without a calculator      Log On


   



Question 239135: 10^(2-5x)=793 please solve without a calculator
Found 2 solutions by JimboP1977, jsmallt9:
Answer by JimboP1977(311) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
10^(2-5x) = 793
log(base 10) 793 = 2-5x
((log(base 10) 793)-2)*-1/5 = x
--------------------

x = -0.1799 (to 4dp)

Answer by jsmallt9(3758) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
10%5E%282-5x%29=793
As far as I can tell, 793 is not an integral power of any integer. So the only way I know how to solve for x is to find the base 10 logarithm of each side:
log%28%2810%5E%282-5x%29%29%29=log%28%28793%29%29
Now we can use the property of logarithms, log%28a%2C+%28p%5Eq%29%29+=+q%2Alog%28a%2C+%28p%29%29, to move the exponent in the argument in front:
%282-5x%29log%28%2810%29%29=log%28%28793%29%29
and since the log(10) = 1 (This is why I chose base 10 logarithms):
2-5x+=+log%28%28793%29%29
Now that x is no longer in an exponent we can use basic Algebra to solve for it. Add -2 to (or subtract 2 from) each side:
-5x+=+-2+%2B+log%28%28793%29%29
Divide both sides by -5:
x+=+%28-2+%2B+log%28%28793%29%29%29%2F%28-5%29
or
x+=+%282+-+log%28%28793%29%29%29%2F%285%29

If "without calculators" means you are allowed to use tables of logarithms instead (Do textbooks come with tables of logarithms in the back anymore?), then we could do the following:
Factor out 100 from 793:
x+=+%282+-+log%28%28100%2A7.93%29%29%29%2F%285%29
Use the property of logarithms, log%28a%2C+%28p%2Aq%29%29+=+log%28a%2C+%28p%29%29+%2B+log%28a%2C+%28q%29%29, to split the 100 and 7.93:
x+=+%282+-+%28log%28%28100%29%29+%2B+log%28%287.93%29%29%29%29%2F%285%29
Since 100+=+10%5E2, log%28%28100%29%29+=+2:
x+=+%282+-+%282+%2B+log%28%287.93%29%29%29%29%2F5
By factoring out the 100, we now have a logarithm we can find in a table:
x+=+%282+-+%282+%2B+0.8993%29%29%2F5
I'll leave this to you to simplify.

If you are not supposed to use a table, I do not see another way to get rid of the logarithm in
x+=+%282+-+log%28%28793%29%29%29%2F5
All we can do is manipulate the expression into possibly more desirable forms. As we saw before 2+=+log%28%28100%29%29 so we substitute for the 2:
x+=+%28log%28%28100%29%29+-+log%28%28793%29%29%29%2F%285%29
Now we can use the property of logarithms, log%28a%2C+%28p%29%29+-+log%28a%2C+%28q%29%29+=+log%28a%2C+%28p%2Fq%29%29, to combine the logarithms in the numerator:
x+=+%28log%28%28100%2F793%29%29%29%2F%285%29
We can change the division by 5 into the multiplication by its reciprocal, 1/5:
x+=+%281%2F5%29%28log%28%28100%2F793%29%29%29
Then we can use the previously used property involving exponents, log%28a%2C+%28p%5Eq%29%29+=+q%2Alog%28a%2C+%28p%29%29, to move the number in front into the argument as an exponent:
x+=+log%28%28%28100%2F793%29%5E%281%2F5%29%29%29%29
Writing the fractional exponent in radical form we get:
x+=+log%28%28root%285%2C+%28100%2F793%29%29%29%29


Which is a "better" answer?
x+=+%282+-+log%28%28793%29%29%29%2F%285%29
or
x+=+log%28%28root%285%2C+%28100%2F793%29%29%29%29
I can't say for sure. I prefer the first one.