| 
 
 
| Question 188853:  I'm dying a slow death in statistics.  Please help!
 In 2004, a small dealership leased 21 Chevrolet Impalas on 2-year leases. When the cars were returned in 2006, the mileage was recorded (see below). Is the dealer's mean significantly greater than the national average of 30,000 miles for 2-year leased vehicles, using the 10 percent level of significance?
 Mileage:
 40,060	24,960	14,310	17,370	44,740	44,550	20,250
 33,380	24,270	41,740	58,630	35,830	25,750	28,910
 25,090	43,380	23,940	43,510	53,680	31,810	36,780
 
 Answer by stanbon(75887)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! In 2004, a small dealership leased 21 Chevrolet Impalas on 2-year leases. When the cars were returned in 2006, the mileage was recorded (see below). Is the dealer's mean significantly greater than the national average of 30,000 miles for 2-year leased vehicles, using the 10 percent level of significance? Mileage:
 40,060 24,960 14,310 17,370 44,740 44,550 20,250
 33,380 24,270 41,740 58,630 35,830 25,750 28,910
 25,090 43,380 23,940 43,510 53,680 31,810 36,780
 -----------------------
 Note: When you post data you should include the sample
 mean and the sample standard deviation.
 -----------------------
 sample mean : xbar = 33949.52
 sample standard deviation : s = 11866.17
 --------------------------------
 Ho: u= 30000
 Ha: u > 30000
 -----------------
 Critical value for right-tail test with df=20 and alpha=10% : t = 1.325
 ---
 test statistic:
 t(33949.52) = (33949.52-30000)/[11866.17/sqrt(21)] = 1.5253
 p-value = P(t > 1.5253 with df=20) = 0.0714
 ------------
 Conclusion:
 Since the p-value is less than 10%, reject Ho.
 The dealer's mean is statistically higher than the national average.
 -------------------
 Cheers,
 Stan H.
 | 
  
 | 
 |