SOLUTION: When a 1/2 liter bottle of a liquid drink is supposed to contain a mean of 520 ml and it has a known process standard deviation of 4 ml, which sampling distribution would be used i

Algebra ->  Probability-and-statistics -> SOLUTION: When a 1/2 liter bottle of a liquid drink is supposed to contain a mean of 520 ml and it has a known process standard deviation of 4 ml, which sampling distribution would be used i      Log On


   



Question 179243: When a 1/2 liter bottle of a liquid drink is supposed to contain a mean of 520 ml and it has a known process standard deviation of 4 ml, which sampling distribution would be used if random samples of 10 bottles are to be weighed? and Why? How do I set up a hypothesis and a two-tailed decision rule for the correct mean using the 5% level of signifance? Also when the sample of 16 bottles shows a mean fill of 515 ml does this contradict the hypothesis that the true mean is 520 ml? #952
Answer by stanbon(75887) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
When a 1/2 liter bottle of a liquid drink is supposed to contain a mean of 520 ml and it has a known process standard deviation of 4 ml, which sampling distribution would be used if random samples of 10 bottles are to be weighed? and Why?
----
Ans: The t-distribution because you are testing a small sample for the validity
of a population mean.
---------------------------------------
How do I set up a hypothesis and a two-tailed decision rule for the correct mean using the 5% level of signifance?
Ho: u = 520
Ha: u is not equal to 520
---------------
Critical value for 2-tail t-test with alpha=5% and df=9 is +-2.262
Rule: If the test statistic if less than -2.262 of greater than 2.262,
reject Ho.
---------------
Also when the sample of 16 bottles shows a mean fill of 515 ml does this contradict the hypothesis that the true mean is 520 ml?
test statistic: t(515) = (515-520)/[4/sqrt(16)] = -5
-----------
Conclusion: Since -5 is less than -2.262, reject Ho.
====================================================
Cheers,
Stan H.