SOLUTION: Is there any reason why my question is going ignored. I am trying to figure out how to solve this problem and have submitted it three times, still no answer 1/2 divided by 3/

Algebra ->  Distributive-associative-commutative-properties -> SOLUTION: Is there any reason why my question is going ignored. I am trying to figure out how to solve this problem and have submitted it three times, still no answer 1/2 divided by 3/      Log On


   



Question 165710: Is there any reason why my question is going ignored.
I am trying to figure out how to solve this problem and have submitted it three times, still no answer
1/2 divided by 3/8+5*(1/3)
so, i am assuming the problem should written out like this:
1/2/3/8+5+(1/3)

Found 2 solutions by Fombitz, Edwin McCravy:
Answer by Fombitz(32388) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

Need a common denominator to add fractions.


%281%2F2%29%2F%28%283%2F8%29%2B5%2A%281%2F3%29%29=%281%2F2%29%2F%2849%2F24%29
Division by a fraction is equivalent to multiplication by its reciprocal.
%281%2F2%29%2F%28%283%2F8%29%2B5%2A%281%2F3%29%29=%281%2F2%29%2A%2824%2F49%29
%281%2F2%29%2F%28%283%2F8%29%2B5%2A%281%2F3%29%29=12%2F49

Answer by Edwin McCravy(20055) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Edwin's solution:
I am trying to figure out how to solve this problem and have submitted it three times, still no answer
1/2 divided by 3/8+5*(1/3)
so, i am assuming the problem should written out like this:
1/2/3/8+5+(1/3)

It's because we are not sure of the way it's written in your
book or worksheet, and we don't want to guess and guess it
wrong.

+matrix%281%2C7%2C+1%2F2%2C%22%F7%22%2C+3%2F8%2C+%22%2B%22%2C+5%2C+%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29++

If it's written this way in your book or worksheet, then the
operation that is given the highest priority here, since there
are no parentheses or exponents, is multiplication or division
going left to right:

We do the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+1%2F2%2C%22%F7%22%2C+3%2F8%29 first



Then we replace the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+1%2F2%2C%22%F7%22%2C+3%2F8%29 by 4%2F3.
So far we have:
+matrix%281%2C5%2C+4%2F3%2C%22%2B%22%2C+5%2C+%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29++

Now the operation that is given the highest priority here is the
multiplication or division going left to right.  So,

We do the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+5%2C%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29 first



Then we replace the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+5%2C%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29 by 5%2F3.
So far we have:

+matrix%281%2C3%2C+4%2F3%2C%22%2B%22%2C+5%2F3%29++

and since the denominators are the same, we can just add the
numerators and get

9%2F3

which reduces to just

3.

-------------

However, you may have meant this:



Then we'd do what's in the parentheses first.

Now the operation that is given the highest priority here is the
multiplication or division going left to right.  So,

Then within the parentheses, we'd do the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+5%2C%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29 
first:



Then we replace the +matrix%281%2C3%2C+5%2C%22%D7%22%2C+1%2F3%29 by 5%2F3.
So far we have:



Then, still working inside the parentheses, we'd have to get
a LCD of 24, changing 3%2F8 to 9%2F24 and 5%2F3 to
40%2F24 and we'd have this within the parentheses:
         matrix%281%2C3%2C9%2F24%2C%22%2B%22%2C40%2F24%29
         9%2F24%2B40%2F24=49%2F24

and we'd replace the %28+matrix%281%2C3%2C3%2F8%2C%22%2B%22%2C5%2F3%29+%29 by 49%2F24    

So we'd have this:

+matrix%281%2C3%2C1%2F2%2C%22%F7%22%2C+49%2F24%29++

And finally we'd invert the second fraction and change the
division to a multiplication:

+matrix%281%2C3%2C1%2F2%2C%22%D7%22%2C+24%2F49%29++

Then finally



So since nobody could tell which of those you meant, nobody
answered.

Edwin