You can put this solution on YOUR website!
I'm assuming you meant to say "for x > -2" since x = -2 is the vertical asymptote.
This is because the x+2 in the denominator has us go from x+2 = 0 to x = -2.
You can use a graphing tool like GeoGebra or Desmos to verify.
You can use a graphing calculator to quickly find the local min or you can use differential calculus. I'll go with the 2nd option.
Set the derivative equal to 0 so we can determine the critical values.
f'(x) = 0
(x^2+4x)/( (x+2)^2 ) = 0
x^2+4x = 0
x(x+4) = 0
x = 0 or x+4 = 0
x = 0 or x = -4
The critical points occur when x = 0 and when x = -4.
Use either the 1st derivative test, or 2nd derivative test, to determine that a local max occurs when x = -4 and a local min occurs when x = 0.
I'll let the student handle this part.
Plug x = 0 back into the original expression.
(x^2)/(x+2) = (0^2)/(0+2) = 0
Therefore the local min on the interval x > -2 is at (0,0)
y = 0 is the smallest output on this interval.
What kind of crazy nonsense problem is this?
Find the minimum value of
for x > 2.
That's this graph below, and we're only looking at the part where
x is greater than 2. That's right of the green line at x = 2.
But then it increases forever there. A minimum value???? If it were
for then the minimum value would be 1 at the point (2,1).
But it's x > 2, where it only gets larger and larger.
Minimum value???? This is pure nuts!!!
Edwin