Question 1209467: Given an array 𝑎[1..𝑛] containing half zeros and half ones, we need to find a position in 𝑎 that contains the value 1. Consider the following two algorithms:
Algorithm 1:
i = 1
while a[i] != 1:
i += 1
return i
Algorithm 2:
while True:
i = random(1, n)
if a[i] == 1:
return i
The function random(1, n) returns a random integer between 1 and 𝑛.
a) Compare the two algorithms.
b) Which algorithm is better?
Found 2 solutions by CPhill, ikleyn:
Answer by CPhill(1987)   (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! Certainly, let's analyze the two algorithms and compare them.
**a) Comparison of Algorithms**
* **Algorithm 1 (Linear Search):**
* **Pros:**
* Guaranteed to find a 1 if it exists.
* Simple to implement.
* **Cons:**
* Worst-case time complexity is O(n), where n is the size of the array.
* Can be slow if the first half of the array contains only zeros.
* **Algorithm 2 (Random Search):**
* **Pros:**
* Can be very fast if a 1 is found early on.
* **Cons:**
* There's no guarantee of finding a 1 in a finite number of steps.
* The worst-case scenario is theoretically infinite.
* The average-case time complexity is harder to analyze but generally less efficient than Algorithm 1.
**b) Which Algorithm is Better?**
* **In general, Algorithm 1 (Linear Search) is generally considered better.**
* **Guaranteed Success:** It provides a guaranteed solution within a finite number of steps.
* **Predictable Performance:** Its worst-case time complexity is known and bounded.
* **When Algorithm 2 might be preferable (in very specific scenarios):**
* If the array is extremely large and the probability of finding a 1 early on is very high (e.g., if the array is almost entirely filled with 1s), Algorithm 2 could be faster. However, this is a highly specific and unlikely scenario.
**In most practical situations, Algorithm 1 (Linear Search) is the more reliable and generally more efficient choice.**
**Note:**
* This analysis assumes that the goal is to find *any* position containing a 1. If the goal is to find the *first* position containing a 1, Algorithm 1 is the only suitable option.
I hope this explanation is helpful!
Answer by ikleyn(52921)  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! .
In this post, the question is like this:
Which algorithm would you prefer: one slow algorithm, but giving 100% precise answer with 100% reliability
or another potentially faster algorithm which probably will NOT give you the 100% precise answer with 100% reliability ?
It reminds me a dialog of two mocks in the classic/famous novel "Gargantua and Pantagruel"
by the French writer Francois Rabelais (written in 16th century).
One monk asks another :
- If you had to travel to Causak (the city in France), what would you prefer -
- to ride a goose or to pull a pig on a string?
To which the other monk replies: - I prefer to drink.
|
|
|
