SOLUTION: Use conditional proof (CP) together with the eight rules of implication and ten rules of replacement to prove that they are valid. Be sure to include the justification for each lin

Algebra ->  Proofs -> SOLUTION: Use conditional proof (CP) together with the eight rules of implication and ten rules of replacement to prove that they are valid. Be sure to include the justification for each lin      Log On


   



Question 1204701: Use conditional proof (CP) together with the eight rules of implication and ten rules of replacement to prove that they are valid. Be sure to include the justification for each line, and offset lines as appropriate for conditional proof.
1. A ⊃ (B ⊃ (C • ~D))
2. (B v E) ⊃ (D v E) /(A • B) ⊃ (C • E)

Answer by math_tutor2020(3817) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

The idea is to assume the antecedent A & B is the case, and show it leads to the consequent C & E
Below is a conditional proof.
NumberStatementLine(s) UsedReason
1A --> (B --> (C & ~D))
2(B v E) -> (D v E)
:.(A & B) --> (C & E)
3A & BAssumption for Conditional Proof
4B & A3Commutation
5A3Simplification
6B4Simplification
7B --> (C & ~D)1,5Modus Ponens
8C & ~D7,6Modus Ponens
9~D & C8Commutation
10C8Simplification
11~D9Simplification
12B v E6Addition
13D v E2,12Modus Ponens
14E13,11Disjunctive Syllogism
15C & E10,14Conjunction
16(A & B) --> (C & E)3 - 15Conditional Proof

We have shown that assuming (A & B) in line 3 leads to (C & E) in line 15.
Therefore, the premises given to us let us conclude that (A & B) --> (C & E) must be the case.

More info:
Logic Rules of Inference and Replacement

A similar logic problem
https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Proofs/Proofs.faq.question.1204702.html