|
Question 1203635: https://brainly.com/question/37551718?answeringSource=feedPublic%2FhomePage%2F1
Found 4 solutions by josgarithmetic, ikleyn, SCrappingDude, MathTherapy:
Answer by josgarithmetic(39631)   (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! You could have just posted the actual question here, and formatted it better than in the link.
If f(x)=-2x 4 and h(x)=5x find h(f(2))
--------------------------------------
If f(x)=-2x 4 and h(x)=5x
then find h(f(2)).
--------------------------------------
Just do the necessary substitutions. Evaluate!
5()-----------------------A NECESSARY SYMBOL IS MISSING.
Answer by ikleyn(52925)  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! .
In this link, I see this text
If f(x)=-2x 4 and h(x)=5x find h(f(2)).
In this text, the formula is presented INCORRECTLY: the necessary arithmetic sign
of an arithmetic operation is MISSED, which is unacceptable (= FATAL) ERROR.
So, the formula is DEFECTIVE. It is NOT READABLE and the problem CAN NOT BE SOLVED.
It is an EXTREMELY inaccurate writing and EXTREMELY irresponsible behavior to post defective formula.
Be more accurate in the future.
Answer by SCrappingDude(6)  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! We first calculate f(2) by substituting x=2 in the given function. We substitute this value into the second function to get h(f(2)), which equals -20.
Given are two functions, f(x)=-2x + 4 and h(x)=5x. We need to find the value of h(f(2)).
The question asks for an application of the function composition, which is a concept in mathematics.
We first find the value of f(2) by substituting x=2 in the function f(x) = -2x + 4. This computes to -4.
This result is then substituted into the second function h(x)=5x to calculate h(f(2)). Therefore, h(-4) = 5*(-4) which equals to -20. So, h(f(2)) is -20.
Answer by MathTherapy(10557)  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
https://brainly.com/question/37551718?answeringSource=feedPublic%2FhomePage%2F1
I do get that an operator is missing from f(x) = - 2x 4. But, if that operator were "+" as these
"psychics" presume, then how does one get f(2) = - 2x + 4 to be - 4? Isn't that RIDICULOUS? I'd
sure love an explanation!!
Additionally, it appears to me that a plagiarist plagiarized RUBBISH!!
|
|
|
| |
