SOLUTION: Cliff left point A at 8:00 A.M walking east at 3 kph. Renz left point A at 9:00 A.M walking north at 4 kph. The distance between the two boys since 8:00 A.M may be expressed as d(t

Algebra ->  Rational-functions -> SOLUTION: Cliff left point A at 8:00 A.M walking east at 3 kph. Renz left point A at 9:00 A.M walking north at 4 kph. The distance between the two boys since 8:00 A.M may be expressed as d(t      Log On


   



Question 1199938: Cliff left point A at 8:00 A.M walking east at 3 kph. Renz left point A at 9:00 A.M walking north at 4 kph. The distance between the two boys since 8:00 A.M may be expressed as d(t)= √(〖at〗^2-2βt+β) where d and t denote the respective distance and time. Find a+β.
Found 2 solutions by textot, ikleyn:
Answer by textot(100) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
**1. Determine the Distances Traveled**
* **Cliff:** Since Cliff started 1 hour earlier and walks at 3 kph, he has traveled 3 km east by 9:00 AM.
* **Renz:** Let 't' be the time in hours since 9:00 AM. Renz travels 4t kilometers north.
**2. Use Pythagorean Theorem**
* The distance between Cliff and Renz at time 't' can be found using the Pythagorean theorem:
d(t) = √[(Cliff's distance)² + (Renz's distance)²]
d(t) = √[(3 + 3t)² + (4t)²]
d(t) = √(9 + 18t + 9t² + 16t²)
d(t) = √(25t² + 18t + 9)
**3. Compare with the Given Expression**
* Compare the derived expression with the given expression:
* d(t) = √(at² + 2βt + β)
* d(t) = √(25t² + 18t + 9)
* We can see that:
* a = 25
* 2β = 18
* β = 9
**4. Calculate a - β**
* a - β = 25 - 9 = 16
**Therefore, a - β = 16.**

Answer by ikleyn(52754) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.

Formulation of this problem is  FATALLY  INCORRECT,  since it incorrectly determines
that time variable  " t "  is counted from  8 AM.

To be correct,  " t "  must be counted from  9 AM.

An accurate mathematical formulation should determine it explicitly,  without any discussions.


Did I say  " should "  in my previous sentence ?

- No,  surely not  " should ".   It  MUST.