| 
 
 
| Question 1198525:  The administrator of a local hospital has told the governing board that 30% of its
 emergency room patients are not really in need of emergency treatment. In checking
 a random sample of 400 emergency room patients, a board member finds that 35%
 of those treated were not true emergency cases. Using an appropriate hypothesis test
 and the 0.05 level, evaluate the administrator’s statement.
 Answer by CPhill(1987)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! **1. Set up Hypotheses** * **Null Hypothesis (H₀):** p = 0.30 (The true proportion of patients not needing emergency treatment is 30%)
 * **Alternative Hypothesis (H₁):** p ≠ 0.30 (The true proportion of patients not needing emergency treatment is different from 30%)
 **2. Calculate Sample Proportion**
 * Sample Proportion (p̂): 35% = 0.35
 **3. Calculate Test Statistic (z-score)**
 * z = (p̂ - p₀) / √[p₀ * (1 - p₀) / n]
 * where:
 * p̂ = sample proportion (0.35)
 * p₀ = hypothesized population proportion (0.30)
 * n = sample size (400)
 * z = (0.35 - 0.30) / √[0.30 * (1 - 0.30) / 400]
 * z = 0.05 / √[0.30 * 0.70 / 400]
 * z = 0.05 / √[0.21 / 400]
 * z = 0.05 / 0.0229
 * z ≈ 2.18
 **4. Determine Critical Values**
 * Since this is a two-tailed test (H₁: p ≠ 0.30) at a 0.05 significance level, we need to find the critical values that divide the distribution into two tails with 0.025 area in each.
 * Using a standard normal distribution table, the critical values are approximately ±1.96.
 **5. Make a Decision**
 * **Compare the test statistic to the critical values:**
 * Our calculated z-score (2.18) is greater than the critical value (1.96).
 * **Decision:** Since the test statistic falls in the rejection region, we **reject the null hypothesis**.
 **6. Conclusion**
 * There is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to reject the administrator's claim that 30% of emergency room patients are not true emergencies. The sample data suggests that the actual proportion may be higher.
 **In Summary:**
 The board member's findings suggest that a higher proportion of patients may not be true emergencies than the administrator's claim. This information can be valuable for hospital resource allocation and improving emergency room efficiency.
 
 | 
  
 | 
 |