.
(a) To find f^-1(-1), you do not need express f^-1(x) in explicit form : it is UNNECESSARY job.
What you really need, is to solve equation f(x) = -1 and find x in this way;
then the found value of x will be your answer, i.e. f^-1(-1).
So, I will do it: I will solve equation
= -1.
To solve, multiply both sides by (2x-3); then simplify
3x + 4 = -(2x-3)
3x + 4 = -2x + 3
3x + 2x = 3 - 4
5x = -1
x =
= -0.2. ANSWER
(b) Since it is given in the post that the function f(x) is one-to-one,
the inverse function f^-1(x) does exist.
For me, it does not matter now what is its concrete expression.
But for the inverse function, the requested identity
f^-1 (f(x))=x
is valid by the DEFINITION: so, THERE IS NOTHING TO PROVE in this case.
Notice and understand, that my reasoning is absolutely correct in this case:
there is NOTHING TO PROVE: the statement follows immediately from the definition and from the given part.
Solved, answered and explained.