.
(a)  To find  f^-1(-1),  you do not need express  f^-1(x) in explicit form : it is UNNECESSARY job.
     What you really need, is to solve equation  f(x) = -1  and find x  in this way;  
     then the found value of x will be your answer, i.e. f^-1(-1).
     So, I will do it:  I will solve equation
          = -1.
      To solve, multiply both sides by  (2x-3);  then simplify
          3x + 4 = -(2x-3)
          3x + 4 = -2x + 3
          3x + 2x = 3 - 4
             5x   =   -1
              x   =
 = -1.
      To solve, multiply both sides by  (2x-3);  then simplify
          3x + 4 = -(2x-3)
          3x + 4 = -2x + 3
          3x + 2x = 3 - 4
             5x   =   -1
              x   =  = -0.2.      ANSWER
(b)  Since it is given in the post that the function f(x) is one-to-one,
     the inverse function  f^-1(x) does exist.
     For me, it does not matter now what is its concrete expression.
     But for the inverse function,  the requested identity
         f^-1 (f(x))=x
     is valid by the DEFINITION:  so,  THERE IS NOTHING TO PROVE  in this case.
     Notice and understand, that my reasoning is absolutely correct in this case: 
         there is NOTHING TO PROVE: the statement follows immediately from the definition and from the given part.
 = -0.2.      ANSWER
(b)  Since it is given in the post that the function f(x) is one-to-one,
     the inverse function  f^-1(x) does exist.
     For me, it does not matter now what is its concrete expression.
     But for the inverse function,  the requested identity
         f^-1 (f(x))=x
     is valid by the DEFINITION:  so,  THERE IS NOTHING TO PROVE  in this case.
     Notice and understand, that my reasoning is absolutely correct in this case: 
         there is NOTHING TO PROVE: the statement follows immediately from the definition and from the given part.
Solved, answered and explained.