SOLUTION: Topics In Contemporary Math Arguments Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid. 2) If you are superstitious, then do not walk

Algebra ->  Testmodule -> SOLUTION: Topics In Contemporary Math Arguments Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid. 2) If you are superstitious, then do not walk      Log On


   



Question 1190253: Topics In Contemporary Math
Arguments
Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid.
2) If you are superstitious, then do not walk under a ladder.
If you do not walk under a ladder, then you are superstitious.
Therefore, you are superstitious and you do not walk under a ladder.

Found 2 solutions by Solver92311, math_tutor2020:
Answer by Solver92311(821) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

S = "You are superstitious"

W = "You walk under a ladder"

~W = "You do not walk under a ladder"


  S   W   ~W   S & ~W

  T   T    F     F
  T   F    T     T
  F   T    F     F
  F   F    T     F

S & ~W could be true or false.  S -> ~W and ~W -> S are both irrelevant to the conclusion.
  

The argument is invalid

John

My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it

From
I > Ø

Answer by math_tutor2020(3817) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

S = you are superstitious
W = you walk under a ladder
~S = you are not superstitious
~W = you do not walk under a ladder

Premise 1: S -> ~W
Premise 2: ~W -> S
Conclusion: S & ~W

Truth table:
Premise 1Premise 2Conclusion
SW~S~WS -> ~W~W -> ~SS & ~W
TTFFFTF
TFFTTTT
FTTFTTF
FFTTTFF
Notes:
  • P -> Q is false when P is false and Q is true, otherwise it's true.
  • P & Q is true when both P and Q are true together, otherwise it's false
  • Whatever you find in column S, flip it to get ~S, and vice versa. Same goes for W to ~W as well.
In the table above, the row marked in red highlights a case when we have all true premises but they lead to a false conclusion.

This directly leads to the fact the argument is invalid.