Question 1183185: Statistics Thought Question:
An athletic league is attempting to reduce injuries. In the off season, volunteers are randomly assigned to three different dietary regimens (high carb, high protein, and gluten free). At the same time the volunteers were randomly assigned to two different workout regimens (short wind sprints with intense lighter weight training; longer interval training and heavier weight training). If you were using 2-way ANOVA to analyze the results of these “trials”, explain what it would mean if there were a statistically significant interaction effect between the dietary regimens and the workout regimens.
How might the “interaction” manifest itself?
Answer by CPhill(1987)   (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! A statistically significant interaction effect in a two-way ANOVA between dietary regimens and workout regimens would mean that the effect of one factor (diet) on injury rates *depends* on the level of the other factor (workout). In simpler terms, the best diet for injury prevention might be different depending on which workout regimen an athlete follows, and vice versa. The effects of diet and exercise aren't simply additive; they combine in a way that can't be predicted by looking at them separately.
Here's how the interaction might manifest itself:
* **Scenario 1: Some diets are better suited to certain workouts:** Perhaps the high-carb diet is beneficial *only* for athletes doing the short wind sprints and lighter weight training. For those doing the longer interval training and heavier weight training, the high-carb diet might not offer any advantage, or it could even be detrimental. Conversely, the high-protein diet might be optimal for the longer interval training but less so for the short sprints.
* **Scenario 2: One combination is particularly risky:** It's possible that a specific combination of diet and workout is particularly prone to injuries. For example, the gluten-free diet combined with the heavier weight training could lead to muscle weakness or imbalances that increase injury risk. While the gluten-free diet or the heavier weight training *separately* might not be problematic, the *combination* could be.
* **Scenario 3: One combination is exceptionally beneficial:** On the flip side, a particular combination could be exceptionally effective at reducing injuries. Perhaps the high-protein diet combined with the short wind sprints leads to optimal muscle recovery and strength gains, significantly lowering the injury rate. This benefit might not be apparent when looking at the high-protein diet or the short sprints in isolation.
* **Scenario 4: Crossing effects:** The interaction could even cause "crossing" effects. For instance, the high-carb diet could *increase* injuries for the heavy weight training group but *decrease* injuries for the sprint group.
**How to interpret the interaction:**
If the ANOVA shows a significant interaction, it means you *cannot* simply talk about the "best" diet or the "best" workout regimen in general. You have to consider the *combination* of diet and workout. The optimal approach for injury prevention will depend on the specific combination the athlete is using.
**Next steps after a significant interaction:**
If you find a significant interaction, you would typically perform *post-hoc* tests (like Tukey's HSD) to determine *which* specific combinations of diet and workout are significantly different from each other. You might also create interaction plots to visualize the effects. These plots would show the injury rates for each combination of diet and workout, making it easier to see the interaction patterns.
|
|
|
