SOLUTION: Consider set A to include all the natural numbers from 1 to 4n, let S be the sum 1+2+3...4n. Now lets randomly partition set A into n subsets each with exactly 4 numbers. Prove tha

Algebra ->  Complex Numbers Imaginary Numbers Solvers and Lesson -> SOLUTION: Consider set A to include all the natural numbers from 1 to 4n, let S be the sum 1+2+3...4n. Now lets randomly partition set A into n subsets each with exactly 4 numbers. Prove tha      Log On


   



Question 1170892: Consider set A to include all the natural numbers from 1 to 4n, let S be the sum 1+2+3...4n. Now lets randomly partition set A into n subsets each with exactly 4 numbers. Prove that you can pick 2 numbers from each subset so that the sum of resulting 2n numbers will be equal to S/2
Answer by ikleyn(52852) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.
Consider set A to include all the natural numbers from 1 to 4n, let S be the sum 1+2+3...4n.
Now lets randomly partition set A into n subsets each with exactly 4 numbers.
Prove that you can pick 2 numbers from each subset so that the sum of resulting 2n numbers will be equal to S/2.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


                                    Solution


            It is very interesting problem of the level much higher than the average school level.
            It is a Math Olympiad level or a Math circle level problem.
            The solution requires several logical steps.
            Watch attentively each my step.


(1)  The sum  1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + . . . + 4n  is equal to  S = %28%284n%29%2A%284n%2B1%29%29%2F2 = 2n*(2n+1).


     Notice that this sum is an EVEN number -- I will use it in the solution which follows.



(2)  Let introduce some designations.


     The problem asks about two sums of 2n numbers each.

         Let B designates one sequence of 2n numbers,  and let S%5BB%5D be the sum of numbers from B.

         Let C designates the other set of 2n numbers, and let S%5BC%5D be the sum of numbers from C.



(3)  Notice that  S%5BB%5D + S%5BC%5D = S = 2n*(2n+1) is an EVEN number.

     It implies that the numbers  S%5BB%5D  and  S%5BC%5D  are EITHER both even OR both ODD.

         It can not happen that one of  S%5BB%5D  and  S%5BC%5D  is an even number, while the other is an odd number.

         The numbers  S%5BB%5D  and  S%5BC%5D  are of the same parity, and their difference is ALWAYS an EVEN number.



(4)  The problem requires to prove that it is possible to construct the sets/(the sequences) B and C in a way that  S%5BB%5D = S%5BC%5D = S/2.


     We can start by constructing the sets/(the sequences) B and C  of 2n terms each 
     by an ARBITRARY way in accordance with the imposed conditions.

     If  eventually  it will be  S%5BB%5D = S%5BC%5D, then everything is Ok and the problem is just solved.

     If, on the contrary,  S%5BB%5D =/= S%5BC%5D,  let say  S%5BB%5D < S%5BC%5D,  then I will find two numbers, 

         b from B and c from C, that differ by 1 unit such that  b = c-1, and will permute b to C and c to B.


         By doing it, I will increase the sum  S%5BB%5D by 1 unit and decrease the sum  S%5BC%5D by 1 unit,

         diminishing the difference  S%5BC%5D - S%5BB%5D  by 2 (two) units.



(5)  By repeating this procedure several times (as many times as needed), I will get new sets B and C with  S%5BB%5D = S%5BC%5D = S/2.

     It proves the statement that has to be proved.


         +--------------------------------------------------------+
         |    The method I use is called the "descent" method.    |
         +--------------------------------------------------------+



(6)  The only statement which remained to be proved is THIS



         In the sets B and C, such that S%5BB%5D < S%5BC%5D, it is always possible to find 
         elements b (from B) and c (from C) that differ in one unit,  with c = b+1.



    But this statement is almost evident/obvious: if you assume the opposite, you quickly will get CONTRADICTION.

-------------

At this point, I completed my proof.