SOLUTION: Describe the transformations on the following graph of f(x)=e^x. State the placement of the horizontal asymptote and y-intercept after the transformation. For example, “left

Algebra ->  Polynomials-and-rational-expressions -> SOLUTION: Describe the transformations on the following graph of f(x)=e^x. State the placement of the horizontal asymptote and y-intercept after the transformation. For example, “left       Log On


   



Question 116016: Describe the transformations on the following graph of f(x)=e^x.
State the placement of the horizontal asymptote and y-intercept after the transformation. For example, “left 1” or “rotated about the y-axis” are descriptions.

a) g(x)=e^x+3

Answer by jim_thompson5910(35256) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
a)

Description of transformation:
Remember, f%28x%29 is the same as y. So this means y=e%5Ex.
So when we say e%5Ex%2B3, we're also saying y%2B3 (replace e%5Ex with y). So this means we're adding 3 to each y value which graphically shows us that we're shifting each y value up 3 units.

----------------------------
Answer:
So the transformation g%28x%29=e%5Ex%2B3 simply shifts the entire curve up 3 units.


Notice if we graph f%28x%29 and g%28x%29, we get

+graph%28+500%2C+500%2C+-10%2C+10%2C+-10%2C+10%2C+exp%28x%29%2Cexp%28x%29%2B3%29+ Graph of f%28x%29=e%5Ex (red) and h%28x%29=e%5Ex%2B3 (green)

and we can visually verify the transformation



Horizontal Asymptote:
Now if we found the asymptote of y=e%5Ex, we would find that the asymptote is y=0. Since we're translating each point on y=e%5Ex up 3 units, we're also translating the horizontal asymptote up 3 units.

----------------------------
Answer:
So the new horizontal asymptote is y=3.

Also, you can visually verify this answer by looking at the graph above




y-intercept in (x, y) form:

If we let x=0 and plug it into y=e%5Ex, we get

y=e%5E0 Plug in x=0

y=1 Raise e to the zeroth power to get one. Remember any number x to the zeroth power is always one (ie x%5E0=1)

So for f%28x%29 the y-intercept is (0,1)


Now if g%28x%29 translates each y value up 3 units, then simply add 3 to the y-coordinate of the y-intercept to get

(0,1+3)---->(0,4)

----------------------------
Answer:
So the new y-intercept is (0,4)

Once again, you can visually verify this answer by looking at the graph above