SOLUTION: Find three consecutive integers whose product is 161 larger than the cube of the smallest integer

Algebra ->  Customizable Word Problem Solvers  -> Numbers -> SOLUTION: Find three consecutive integers whose product is 161 larger than the cube of the smallest integer      Log On

Ad: Over 600 Algebra Word Problems at edhelper.com


   



Question 1155188: Find three consecutive integers whose product is 161 larger than the cube of the smallest integer
Found 2 solutions by ewatrrr, MathTherapy:
Answer by ewatrrr(24785) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

Hi
Let n represent the smallest integer
n(n+1)(n+2) = n^3- 161
n(n^2 + 3n + 2)= n^3- 161
n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n = n^3 + 161
3n^2 + 2n - 161 = 0
green%28n=7%29 Integer solution
Integers 7 , 8 , 9
CHECKING our answer*** 7*8*9 = 7^3 + 161 = 504
Wish You the Best in your Studies.
Solved by pluggable solver: SOLVE quadratic equation with variable
Quadratic equation ax%5E2%2Bbx%2Bc=0 (in our case 3x%5E2%2B2x%2B-161+=+0) has the following solutons:

x%5B12%5D+=+%28b%2B-sqrt%28+b%5E2-4ac+%29%29%2F2%5Ca

For these solutions to exist, the discriminant b%5E2-4ac should not be a negative number.

First, we need to compute the discriminant b%5E2-4ac: b%5E2-4ac=%282%29%5E2-4%2A3%2A-161=1936.

Discriminant d=1936 is greater than zero. That means that there are two solutions: +x%5B12%5D+=+%28-2%2B-sqrt%28+1936+%29%29%2F2%5Ca.

x%5B1%5D+=+%28-%282%29%2Bsqrt%28+1936+%29%29%2F2%5C3+=+7
x%5B2%5D+=+%28-%282%29-sqrt%28+1936+%29%29%2F2%5C3+=+-7.66666666666667

Quadratic expression 3x%5E2%2B2x%2B-161 can be factored:
3x%5E2%2B2x%2B-161+=+3%28x-7%29%2A%28x--7.66666666666667%29
Again, the answer is: 7, -7.66666666666667. Here's your graph:
graph%28+500%2C+500%2C+-10%2C+10%2C+-20%2C+20%2C+3%2Ax%5E2%2B2%2Ax%2B-161+%29

Answer by MathTherapy(10552) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

Find three consecutive integers whose product is 161 larger than the cube of the smallest integer
Let the first integer be F
Then other 2 are: F + 1, and F + 2
We then get: matrix%281%2C3%2C+F%28F+%2B+1%29%28F+%2B+2%29%2C+%22=%22%2C+F%5E3+%2B+161%29
matrix%281%2C3%2C+F%28F%5E2+%2B+3F+%2B+2%29%2C+%22=%22%2C+F%5E3+%2B+161%29
matrix%281%2C3%2C+3F%5E2+%2B+2F+-+161%2C+%22=%22%2C+0%29
matrix%281%2C3%2C+3F%5E2+%2B+23F+-+21F+-+161%2C+%22=%22%2C+0%29 ----- Substituting 23F - 21F for 2F
F(3F + 23) - 7(3F + 23) = 0
F - 7 = 0 OR 3F + 23 = 0
OR 3F = - 23 (ignore)