|  | 
| 
 
 
| Question 1151933:  You are considering two job offers for selling TVs.
 Job A pays $300 plus $9.00 per hour
 Job B pays straight $12.50 per hour
 How many hours would you have to work for job B to be BETTER?
 Answer by Theo(13342)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! A pays 300 + 9 per hour. B pays 12.50 per hour.
 let x = number of hours.
 let rA = total pay from A.
 let rB = total pay frm B.
 you want to know the rB > rA (more pay is better).
 rB > rA when 12.50 * x > 300 + 9 * x.
 subtract 9x from both sides of this inequality to get:
 12.50 * x - 9 * x > 300
 combine like terms to get:
 3.5 * x > 300
 divide both sides of this inequality by 3.5 to get:
 x > 300 / 3.5
 solve for x to get:
 x > 85.71428571.
 B will be better (total compensation is more) when the number of hours worked is greater than 85.71428571.
 if you're dealing with integer hours, then 86 is your answer.
 85 hours * 9 + 300 = 1065 total compensation.
 85 hours * 12.50 = 1062.5 total compensation.
 A is better.
 86 hours * 9 + 300 = 1074 total compensation.
 86 hours * 12.50 = 1075 total compensation.
 B is better.
 as the hours get higher than 85.71428571, B gets better and stays better.
 
 
 
 | 
  
 | 
 |  |  |