1. (A∨~B)→(F∨(R∙G)) Premise
2. A Premise
3. F→L Premise
4. (R∙G)→T Premise
5. (L∨T)→S Premise
6. A v ~B 2 Addition (ADD)
7. F v (R∙G) 6,1 Modus Ponens (MP)
8. L v T 7,3,4 Constructive Dilemma (CD)
9. S 8,5 MP (conclusion)
—————————
After reviewing my first answer, I realized that the conditional proof was not only incorrect, it was unnecessary.