.
if 2costheta=x=1/x, 2cosphi=y+1/y,2coslamida=z+1/z,then prove that 2cos(theta+phi+lamida)=xyz+1/(xyz).
plz send me ans as early as possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obviously,   the post contains the error  (the typo ?)  in this part   "2costheta = x=1/x",  which must be read as  "2costheta = x+(1/x)".
With this editing, the solution is as follows.
1.  If  2*cos(theta) = x + (1/x),  it implies that 
    EITHER  x = 1   and  then  2cos(theta) = 1 + (1/1) = 2  ====>  cos(theta) = 1  ====>  theta = 0,
    OR      x = -1  and  then  2cos(theta) = -1 + (1/(-1)) = -2  ====>  cos(theta) = -1  ====>  theta = 
.
   It is simply because  x + (1/x) >= 2  if x is positive,  or
                         x + (1/x) <= -2  if x is negative,
   which is  VERY WELL KNOWN fact.
2.  Similarly, from the given data 
    cos(phi) = +/-1      and  phi    = 0     or  phi    =  
.
    cos(lambda) = +/-1   and  lambda = 0     or  lambda =  
.
3.  Now, if  theta=0,  phi=0  and  lambda=0
         (equivalently, all three cosines are equal to 1)
    then  2cos(theta+phi+lamida)=xyz+1/(xyz)  is, obviously, true.
    Also, if  theta=
,  phi=
  and  lambda=
         (equivalently, all three cosines are equal to -1)
    then  2cos(theta+phi+lamida)=xyz+1/(xyz)  is, obviously, true, again.
    Finally, if any other combination of possible angles is chosen, 
    it will lead to the same equality, as it is easy to check, having very restricted number of combinations.
SOLVED.
------------------
The key idea of the solution above is this fact:
    if x is the positive real number, then  
 >=2,  
    
    and the equality takes place if and only if  x = 1.
Proof
 = 
 is greater than or equal to 2.
The equality takes place if and only if  
 = 0,  which is equivalent to 
 = 0  <=== equivalent to  ===>  
 = 
    <=== equivalent to  ===>  x = 1  (under the assumption that x is positive).
The proof is completed.
    Notice.  If you have questions or need more help, you can send a message to me through the "Thank you" form note.
             In this case PLEASE do not forget to refer to the problem ID number, which is  1095761,  
             in order for I could identify the problem.