SOLUTION: Determine the value(s) of k such that the circle x^2+(y-6)^2 = 36 and the parabola x^2 = 4ky will intersect only at the origin.

Algebra ->  Systems-of-equations -> SOLUTION: Determine the value(s) of k such that the circle x^2+(y-6)^2 = 36 and the parabola x^2 = 4ky will intersect only at the origin.      Log On


   



Question 1048633: Determine the value(s) of k such that the circle x^2+(y-6)^2 = 36 and the parabola x^2 = 4ky will intersect only at the origin.
Found 3 solutions by josgarithmetic, ikleyn, robertb:
Answer by josgarithmetic(39617) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
In trying to think of some algebraic steps to begin, putting in (0,0) for both equations makes for k=0. Note that the circle equations does not involve itself with k.

Answer by ikleyn(52787) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.
Determine the value(s) of k such that the circle x^2+(y-6)^2 = 36 and the parabola x^2 = 4ky will intersect only at the origin.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

x%5E2%2B%28y-6%29%5E2 = 36,   (1)
x%5E2 = 4ky           (2)


The circle x%5E2%2B%28y-6%29%5E2 = 36 has the center at (x,y) = (0,6) and has the radius of 6. 
So, the circle has the y-axis x=0 as a diameter and as a symmetry line, passes through the origin and touches the x-axis.

Parabola x%5E2 = 4ky also passes through the origin; has the y-axis x=0 as its symmetry line, and touches the x-axis.

After these geometric considerations (that are useful but are not absolutely necessary) let solve the problem algebraically.

Based on (2), substitute 4ky instead of x%5E2 into the equation (1). You will get

4ky+%2B+%28y-6%29%5E2 = 36.

So, in this way you excluded "x" from the system and got a single equation for "y". Let us simplify it:

4ky+%2B+y%5E2+-+12y+%2B+36 = 36,  or

y%5E2+%2B+%284k-12%29%2Ay = 0.  (1)

Now, the problem requires this equation (1) to have only one non-negative solution.
     (One solution is evident/obvious. It is y = 0.)

It implies that (4k-12) MUST be non-positive:  4k-12 <= 0.
OTHERWISE y = -%284k-12%29 would be the other non-negative solution to (1).

So, the solution to the problem is this inequality 4k-12 <= 0,  or, equivalently,  k <= 3   (3 = 12%2F4)


Answer.  k <= 3.

See an illustration below for k = 3, 2, and 4.



The circle x%5E2%2B%28y-6%29%5E2 = 36 (red + green)
and three parabolas x^2 = 4ky for k=3 (blue), k=2, and k=4.




The circle x%5E2%2B%28y-6%29%5E2 = 36 (green)
and three parabolas x^2 = 4ky for k=3 (blue), k=2, and k=4.


For solution of similar problems see the lesson
    - Solving systems of algebraic equations of degree 2
in this site.

Also, you have this free of charge online textbook in ALGEBRA-I in this site
    - ALGEBRA-I - YOUR ONLINE TEXTBOOK.


Answer by robertb(5830) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
From the system x%5E2%2B%28y-6%29%5E2+=+36 and +x%5E2+=+4ky+ we fast-forward to the point where, after substitution and a little algebra, we get
y%5E2%2B%284k-12%29y+=+0.

Case 1.
We know beforehand that the two curves intersect at (0,0). To ensure that the above equation has at least one solution, let the discriminant
b%5E2-4ac+=+%284k-12%29%5E2+-+4%2A1%2A0+=+%284k-12%29%5E2+%3E=+0
===> 4k-12+%3E=+0 ===> k+%3E=+3.
Now when k = 3, the circle will "fit" snugly on the parabola at the origin, hence intersect only at that point.
We focus on the instance k > 3.
===> y%5E2%2B%284k-12%29y+=+y%28y%2B%284k-12%29%29+=+0 ===> y = 0, -(4k-12).
But y+=+-%284k-12%29+%3C+0. If k > 3 are plugged into +x%5E2+=+4ky+, we will be solving for +x%5E2+=+-4k%284k-12%29+%3C+0+, a contradiction, hence not producing new solutions other than the origin.
Therefore, for k in [3, infinity), the parabola +x%5E2+=+4ky+ will intersect the circle only at the origin.

Case 2. For k in (-infinity, 0]:
If k = 0, +x%5E2+=+4ky+ becomes x%5E2+=+0, or the vertical line x = 0, which is not a parabola, so k = 0 is excluded.
For k < 0, the parabola opens downward (can accept only negative y values), hence it will automatically intersect the circle only at the origin.


Case 3. 0 < k < 3:
It can be shown that for 3/2 < k < 3, the parabola will intersect the circle at two points of equal level at the LOWER semicircular part.
For k = 3/2, the parabola intersects at the points (-6,6) and (6,6) (the diametrical points!).
For 0 < k < 3/2, the parabola will intersect the circle at two points of equal level at the UPPER semicircular part.
Therefore for Case 3, there are exactly 3 points of intersection, including the origin.

The final answer, therefore, is that k should be in (-infinity,0)∪[3, infinity), for the origin to be the ONLY intersection point.