| 
 
 
| Question 1045308:  a school has fewer than 200 pupils
 When they line up on rows of 4 there is 1 extra pupils
 When they line up on rows of 5 there is 2 extra pupils
 When they line up on rows of 6 there is 3 extra pupils
 how many pupils could here be in the school?
 
 Answer by KMST(5328)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!  = number of pupils in the school. When they line up on rows of 4 there is 1 extra pupil left over.
 If
  more pupils were enrolled, there would be  pupils, and they could line up in rows of
  without any extra pupil left over, because the  new pupils plus the  pupil previously left over would form another row of
  pupils. So, let's enroll
  more pupils, because  is a multiple of  , and then we can line them all in rows of
  without leaving any extra pupils. But what if we want to line them in rows of
  ? Well, that works too. We can group the
  newly enrolled pupils with the  extra pupils that were left over when we only had  pupils, and they could form a new row of
  pupils. It turns out that
  is a multiple of  too. All right, so
  is a good number of pupils if we want to line them up in rows of  or  , but what if we want to line them up in rows of
  ? It did not work with
  pupils, because we had  extra pupils left over. With those
  pupils, and the  newly enrolled pupils, we can make a new row with  pupils. Wow! It turns out that
  is a multiple of  too. So,
  is the right number of pupils for a school that likes to line them up in even rows. That
  must be a magical number. It is a multiple of 
  ,  and  . The least common multiple of
  ,  and  is 
  , the smaller multiple of
  that is also a multiple of  ,  : 
  and  . So, it could be that
 
  -->  --->  , or it could be that
 
  -->  --->  , or it could be that
 
  -->  --->  . The next multiple of
  ,  , does not work, because
  <--->  makes the number of pupils greater than  . So the school could have
  pupils, or  pupils, or  pupils.
 | 
  
 | 
 |