| 
 
 
| Question 1035368:   The manufacturer of a particular all-season tire claims that the tires last for 22,000 miles.  After purchasing the tires you discover that yours did not last the full 22,000 miles.  Suppose that a sample of 100 tires made by that manufacturer lasted on average 21,819 miles with a sample standard deviation of 1,295 miles.  Is there sufficient evidence to refute the manufacturer’s claim that the tires last 22,000 miles?  Let a = 0.05.  Assume that the population standard deviation is s = 1300.
 a.      Define the null and alternative hypotheses.
 b.      Find the appropriate rejection region.
 c.      Compute the test statistic.
 d.      What is your conclusion?  Explain.
 Answer by stanbon(75887)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!  The manufacturer of a particular all-season tire claims that the tires last for 22,000 miles. After purchasing the tires you discover that yours did not last the full 22,000 miles. Suppose that a sample of 100 tires made by that manufacturer lasted on average 21,819 miles with a sample standard deviation of 1,295 miles. Is there sufficient evidence to refute the manufacturer’s claim that the tires last 22,000 miles? Let a = 0.05. Assume that the population standard deviation is s = 1300. a. Define the null and alternative hypotheses.
 Ho: u >= 22000 (claim)
 Ha: u < 22000
 ---------------------
 b. Find the appropriate rejection region.
 z < -1.645
 ------------------------
 c. Compute the test statistic.
 z(21819-22000)/(1300/sqrt(100) = -1.3923
 ----------------------
 d. What is your conclusion? Explain.
 Since the test stat is not in the reject interval,
 fail to reject Ho. The test results support the claim.
 ---------
 Cheers,
 Stan H.
 ---------
 | 
  
 | 
 |