SOLUTION: solve the inequality of |3x+1|<2+|2x+3|

Algebra ->  Absolute-value -> SOLUTION: solve the inequality of |3x+1|<2+|2x+3|      Log On


   



Question 1031982: solve the inequality of |3x+1|<2+|2x+3|
Found 4 solutions by josgarithmetic, MathTherapy, ikleyn, solver91311:
Answer by josgarithmetic(39617) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Identify critical x values and form the intervals on the number line. Test any value in each interval for truth or false.

x%3C-3%2F2
Pick -6.
abs%283%28-6%29%2B1%29%3C2%2Babs%282%28-6%29%2B3%29
17%3C2%2B9
17%3C11
FALSE

-3%2F2%3Cx%3C-1%2F3
Pick -1.
abs%28-3%2B1%29%3C2%2Babs%28-2%2B3%29
2%3C2%2B1
2%3C3
TRUE

-1%2F3%3Cx
Pick 0.
1%3C2%2B3
TRUE

Just to be clear, ALSO try to check AT each critical value.
0%3C2%2Babs%282%28-3%2F2%29%2B3%29
0%3C2 TRUE but note that x at -3/2 is true because you are working with a strict inequality.

Solution is highlight%28x%3E-3%2F2%29.

Answer by MathTherapy(10552) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

solve the inequality of |3x+1|<2+|2x+3|
highlight_green%28-+1.2+%3C+x+%3C+4%29 


Answer by ikleyn(52786) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.
It is better one time to see . . .



Figure. Plot of the function abs%283x%2B1%29+-+%282%2Babs%282x%2B3%29%29


Answer by solver91311(24713) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!


Re-write so that the inequality can be decomposed into a piece-wise function:



This inequality has two critical points; values that make one of the expressions inside of the absolute value bars equal to zero, namely and

Hence there are three intervals to consider when creating a piece-wise function definition: and

Since and when , we can say:

if

So we need to find the interval that satisfies both and



.

But the intervals and are disjoint. Hence, there is no part of the solution set in the interval .

Next, for values in ,



So, set the function less than zero and solve:





Hence, the function is true on the interval

Finally, for values in





So the inequality holds for values in the interval

That leaves the value to check which we can do in the original inequality:





So now we can specify the union of the two valid intervals which include the endpoint, and



Is the complete solution set interval.

Compare this result to the portion of the graph of that is below the -axis.



John

My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it