Question 1009691: The owner of a football team claims that the average attendance at home games is over 3000, and he is therefore justified in moving the team to a city with a larger stadium. Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is failure to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in non-technical terms.
A. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 3000.
B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is equal to 3000.
C. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 3000.
D. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is less than 3000.
Answer by stanbon(75887)   (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! The owner of a football team claims that the average attendance at home games is over 3000, and he is therefore justified in moving the team to a city with a larger stadium. Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is failure to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in non-technical terms.
Ho: u <= 3000
Ha: u < 3000 (claim)
---------------------
Ans: D
---------
cheers,
Stan H.
------------
A. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 3000.
B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is equal to 3000.
C. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 3000.
D. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is less than 3000.
|
|
|
