Question 1196893: The radioactive isotope carbon 14 used to date fossils decays with an annual rate of about 0.000124. If a fossil is found which originally has 2 mg of carbon 14, and it now has 0.18 mg, how old is it?
Found 4 solutions by math_tutor2020, josgarithmetic, ikleyn, greenestamps: Answer by math_tutor2020(3816) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
a = initial value
b = determines if we have growth or decay depending if b > 1 or 0 < b < 1.
x = number of years
y = amount of carbon-14 in mg
Given info:
a = 2
b = 1 + r = 1 - 0.000124 = 0.999876
y = 0.18
y = a*b^x
0.18 = 2*0.999876^x
2*0.999876^x = 0.18
0.999876^x = 0.18/2
0.999876^x = 0.09
log(0.999876^x) = log(0.09)
x*log(0.999876) = log(0.09)
x = log(0.09)/log(0.999876)
x = 19,417.7122011154
Answer: Approximately 19,417 years old
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an approach using the half-life formula
The half-life of carbon 14 is approximately H = 5730 years according to these sources here
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/carbon-14
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-14
Every 5730 years or so, the amount cuts in half.
y = a*0.5^(x/H)
0.18 = 2*0.5^(x/5730)
0.5^(x/5730) = 0.18/2
0.5^(x/5730) = 0.09
log( 0.5^(x/5730) ) = log(0.09)
(x/5730)*log(0.5) = log(0.09)
x/5730 = log(0.09)/log(0.5)
x = 5730*log(0.09)/log(0.5)
x = 19,905.6257091448
x = 19,906
This isn't too far from the 19,417 value calculated earlier.
On the scale of tens of thousands of years, a few hundred years isn't that much of a difference
19906-19417 = 488
489/19906 = 0.0246 = 2.46% error approximately
Though of course the level of precision will depend on what context you're in. If you're casually talking to a friend, then you don't need that much precision. For scientific papers, then you'll definitely need more accuracy.
Here's a calculator to help check your work
https://www.omnicalculator.com/chemistry/carbon-dating
In this case there's 0.18/2 = 0.09 = 9% of the carbon 14 left
The calculator will produce the result of 19,906
This result is approximate due to the fact that the half-life 5730 was approximate.
Answer by josgarithmetic(39616) (Show Source): Answer by ikleyn(52776) (Show Source): Answer by greenestamps(13198) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Some comments about the problem and the other responses you have received....
(1) Your decay rate of 0.000124 corresponds to a carbon 14 half life of 5590 years. Internet sources place the half life at 5730 plus or minus 30 years.
(2) Radioactive decay is a statistical process; the amount remaining does not follow a smooth decaying exponential curve. Any age obtained using carbon 14 dating can only be treated as approximate. Any answer that gives a carbon 14 age should show no more than about 3 significant figures.
|
|
|