SOLUTION: Topics In Contemporary Math Arguments Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid. 3) I will not wear a Speedo at the beach or I

Algebra ->  Testmodule -> SOLUTION: Topics In Contemporary Math Arguments Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid. 3) I will not wear a Speedo at the beach or I      Log On


   



Question 1190254: Topics In Contemporary Math
Arguments
Use truth tables to determine if each of the following arguments are valid or invalid.
3) I will not wear a Speedo at the beach or I will be embarrassed.
I am not embarrassed.
Therefore, I did not wear a Speedo at the beach.

Answer by Edwin McCravy(20056) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Always let letters represent the positive idea, not the negative idea.

Let S = "I will wear a Speedo at the beach"
Let E = "I will be embarrassed"

I will not wear a Speedo at the beach or I will be embarrassed.
That's the 1st premise:  ~S ∨ E

I am not embarrassed.
That's the 2nd premise:  ~E

Therefore, I did not wear a Speedo at the beach.
That's the conclusion:  ~S

That written in symbols is   [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S

Put ● between the premises and ⊃ between the set of premises 
and the conclusion.

Put "not" (negation) indicated by ~ before the positive 
premises if necessary to make them negative 

Put TTFF under each S and TFTF under each E

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
     T   T      T      T
     T   F      F      T
     F   T      T      F
     F   F      F      F

Under each ~ put the opposite of what follows it. That is,
if a T follows the ~ put an F under the ~, and if an F 
follows the ~, put a T under the.

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
    FT   T     FT     FT
    FT   F     TF     FT
    TF   T     FT     TF
    TF   F     TF     TF

Erase what followed the ~

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
    F    T     F      F 
    F    F     T      F 
    T    T     F      T
    T    F     T      T

Under the ∨ put F only if there are F's
immediately on BOTH sides of the ∨.  
Otherwise put a T.

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
    F  T T     F      F 
    F  F F     T      F 
    T  T T     F      T
    T  T F     T      T

Erase what the ∨ was between

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
       T       F      F 
       F       T      F 
       T       F      T
       T       T      T

Under the ● (and) put T only if there are T's 
immediately on BOTH sides of the ●.  Otherwise 
put a F.

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
       T    F  F      F 
       F    F  T      F 
       T    F  F      T
       T    T  T      T

Erase what the ● was between:

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
            F         F 
            F         F 
            F         T
            T         T

Under the ⊃ (conditional (if-then) put F only 
if there is a T on the LEFT of the ⊃ and an F 
on the RIGHT.  Otherwise put a T.

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
            F      T   F    
            F      T   F 
            F      T   T
            T      T   T

Erase what the ⊃ was between

  [(~S ∨ E) ●  ~E] ⊃  ~S
  ----------------------- 
                   T    
                   T    
                   T   
                   T   

This tells us the argument is totally valid.

If you are left with a line of all T's, the
argument is valid.  If there had been any F's,
it would only be conditionally valid.

[Notice we started with T's and F's under the letters
only, and then got them all under the symbols and none
under the letters, then we ended up with only one column.

Edwin