SOLUTION: Simplify. Assume that no denominator is zero and that 0^0 is not considered. thanks (a7/-7b^4) ^6

Algebra ->  Equations -> SOLUTION: Simplify. Assume that no denominator is zero and that 0^0 is not considered. thanks (a7/-7b^4) ^6      Log On


   



Question 241588: Simplify. Assume that no denominator is zero and that 0^0 is not considered. thanks
(a7/-7b^4) ^6

Found 2 solutions by stanbon, Alan3354:
Answer by stanbon(75887) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Assume that no denominator is zero and that 0^0 is not considered. thanks
(a^7/-7b^4)^6
---
(a^42)/(117649b^24)
=======================
Cheers,
Stan H.

Answer by Alan3354(69443) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
%28a7%2F-7b%5E4%29%5E6 Is that a7 a^7?
= %28a%5E7%2F7b%5E4%29%5E6 for some reason the minus sign caused a problem
= a%5E42%2F117649b%5E24
-------------
Note: by convention, 0%5E0+=+1
-----------------------
The following is a list of reasons why 0^0 should be 1.

Rotando & Korn show that if f and g are real functions that vanish at the origin and are analytic at 0 (infinitely differentiable is not sufficient), then f(x)^g(x) approaches 1 as x approaches 0 from the right.
From Concrete Mathematics p.162 (R. Graham, D. Knuth, O. Patashnik):

Some textbooks leave the quantity 0^0 undefined, because the functions 0^x and x^0 have different limiting values when x decreases to 0. But this is a mistake. We must define x^0=1 for all x , if the binomial theorem is to be valid when x=0 , y=0 , and/or x=-y . The theorem is too important to be arbitrarily restricted! By contrast, the function 0^x is quite unimportant.
Published by Addison-Wesley, 2nd printing Dec, 1988.

As a rule of thumb, one can say that 0^0 = 1 , but 0.0^(0.0) is undefined, meaning that when approaching from a different direction there is no clearly predetermined value to assign to 0.0^(0.0) ; but Kahan has argued that 0.0^(0.0) should be 1, because if f(x), g(x) --> 0 as x approaches some limit, and f(x) and g(x) are analytic functions, then f(x)^g(x) --> 1 .
The discussion of 0^0 is very old. Euler argues for 0^0 = 1 since a^0 = 1 for a not equal to 0 . The controversy raged throughout the nineteenth century, but was mainly conducted in the pages of the lesser journals: Grunert's Archiv and Schlomilch's Zeitshrift. Consensus has recently been built around setting the value of 0^0 = 1 .