SOLUTION: Two positive integers M and N are defined to be relatively prime if GCF(M, N) = 1. Which two pairs are numbers below are relatively prime? a. 17 and 51 b. 6 and 25

Algebra ->  Divisibility and Prime Numbers  -> Lessons -> SOLUTION: Two positive integers M and N are defined to be relatively prime if GCF(M, N) = 1. Which two pairs are numbers below are relatively prime? a. 17 and 51 b. 6 and 25      Log On


   



Question 53043: Two positive integers M and N are defined to be relatively prime if GCF(M, N) = 1. Which two pairs are numbers below are relatively prime?
a. 17 and 51
b. 6 and 25
c. 18 and 45
d. None of the above. In order for two numbers to be relatively prime, at least one of them has to be prime

Found 3 solutions by consc198, math_iz_hard, ikleyn:
Answer by consc198(59) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
a. 17 and 51

Answer by math_iz_hard(8) About Me  (Show Source):
Answer by ikleyn(53937) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.
Divisibility_and_Prime_Numbers/53043: Two positive integers M and N are defined to be relatively prime
if GCF(M, N) = 1. Which two pairs are numbers below are relatively prime?
a. 17 and 51
b. 6 and 25
c. 18 and 45
d. None of the above. In order for two numbers to be relatively prime, at least one of them has to be prime
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


        The answer in the post by @consc198 is  FATALLY  WRONG.


The pair (17,51) has GCF (Greatest Common Factor) of 17, so these numbers are NOT relatively prime.

The pair (6,25) has GCF (Greatest Common Factor) of 1, so these numbers are relatively prime.

The pair (18,45) has GCF (Greatest Common Factor) of 9, so these numbers are NOT relatively prime.

Thus of the three given pairs of numbers, only one pair has relatively prime companions.
This pair is option (b)


Notice that the question is posed/worded incorrectly in the problem:
it asks "which two pairs below are relatively prime?",
while there is ONLY ONE such pair among the listed.