|  | 
| 
 
 
| Question 1001766:  What is the intersection of a cone and a plane parallel to a line along the side of the cone?
 Provide mathematical examples to support your opinions. You may use equations, diagrams, or graphs to organize and present your thoughts.
 Found 2 solutions by  solver91311, KMST:
 Answer by solver91311(24713)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! 
 If by "line along the side of the cone" you mean one of the generators of the cone, then the intersection is a parabola.
 
 John
 
  My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it
 
  Answer by KMST(5328)
      (Show Source): 
You can put this solution on YOUR website! The person asking the question has a meaning in mind for the expressions "a cone" and "a plane parallel to a line along the side of the cone". Not knowing him/her, I cannot read that mind, so I must make some assumptions.
 
 A straight line along the side of the cone must go through the vertex of the cone.
 Let's place that cone on a 3D x-y-z coordinate space,
 or rather, I will place x-, y-, and z-axes around that cone.
 I will place the vertex at the origin,
 the axis of the cone along the positive y-axis, and
 the "line along the side of the cone" on the x-y plane.
 The cross section of the cone with the line looks kind of like this:
 
  . I assume that by cone we mean an infinite lateral surface,
 with no base, or a base represented by
  , if you wish. I am not assuming that the infinite cone extends to any
  . The equation of the line is
  . The equation for the cone would be
  , and the z-axis is the axis that we do not see,
 because it comes perpendicularly out of the screen towards us,
 but at every
  level, the "horizontal" section of the cone is a circle, centered at the point with
  , with radius
  , such that  <--->  . 
 Now, how could we place a plane parallel to that
  line? 
 The line
  is part of the plane  that is tangent to the cone's surface. A plane parallel to that plane,
  , is a plane that I would call parallel to the line
  . That is probably what was envisioned in the question. I assume so.
 The intersection of
  and  is obviously
 
  -->  -->  -->  -->  -->  -->  and that equation does look like a parabola.
 Of course, the intersection of the cone and plane is not on the x-z plane.
 
  is just the projection of that parabolic intersection on the x-z plane. The actual intersection is slightly stretched version of that projection.
 We can keep the x-axis, but we need a new
  axis. That is the line
  , and on that axis a
   becomes a distance   , so the parabola is just a little stretched.
 
 The line
  is also part of the plane  that contains the axis of the cone. A plane parallel to that plane,
  , is also a plane that I would call parallel to the line
  . The intersection of
  and  is obviously
  -->  -->  -->  -->  . That is half of a hyperbola on the
  plane. 
 There is an infinite number of other planes that I could consider,
 but I think of them as linear combinations of the planes already described.
 | 
  
 | 
 |  |  |