Tutors Answer Your Questions about Proofs (FREE)
Question 990654: five students-Joe,Kim,Linda,mark and nicole are enrolled in grades ranging from first to fifth.
EACH STUDENT IS IN A DIFFERENT GRADE.
MARK IS IN A LOWER GRADE THAN KIM
NICOLE AND LINDA ARE IN THE FIRST AND FIFTH GRADES ALTHOUGH NOT NECESSARILY IN THAT ORDER
Which of the following must be false?
a.Kim is in a lower grade than Nicole
b.Kim is in the second grade
c.Joe is in the second grade
d.Joe is in the third grade.
e.Kim is a higher grade than Joe
If Mark is in the third grade which of the following must be true/
A.Joe is in a higher grade than Kim.
B.Kim is in a lower grade than Nicole,
C.Nicole is in the first grade.
D.Joe is in a lower grade than Mar.
E.Linda is in the first grade.
Pls answer asap!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click here to see answer by solver91311(24713)  |
Question 999025: Hi, I need help with finishing these proofs for my PHI class I am so confused! :(
[1]
1. ~T
2. R ⊃S
3. S⊃T Conclusion: /~R
[2]
1. (F · P)⊃~Y
2. F
3. J⊃Y
4. P Conclusion: /~J
[3]
1. A v (Bv D)
2. ~A
3. B⊃X
4. D⊃~H
5. ~X Conclusion: /~H
Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054)  |
Question 998980: Using the logical rules of replacement and implication, I was supposed to solve this logical proof. and am now very lost:
(Key: . being used for conjunction
+ being used for disjunction
> being used for implication)
Premise 1: W+P
Premise 2:~(W.S)
Premise 3: ~(S.P)
Conclusion~(S.U)
I have tried everything! Please help.
Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054)  |
Question 1003311: I have been on these proofs for days and I can't seem to figure my homework out. Thank you for looking at this problem. Here is an example that would help me if figured out.
N>[(P>P)>W] / W>{[M>(I>M)]>(O.~O)} // ~N
The > represents the horseshoe
Thanks again.
Click here to see answer by jim_thompson5910(35256) |
Question 1003826: Example:
1. A
2. A>B / B
3. B 1,2 MP ←You add this line
1. G > H
2. ~H / ~G
3.
1. J > K
2. K > (L * M) / J > (L * M)
3.
1. O v P
2. ~O / P
3.
1. R * S / S
2.
1. R
2. T / R * T
3.
1. W / W v X
2.
1. (X > Y) * (Y > Z)
2. X v Y / Y v Z
3.
1. (C * D) > (E v F)
2. C * D / E v F
3.
1. (G > H) > (I * J)
2. ~(I * J) / ~(G > H)
3.
1. (J v K) > ~(L > M)
2. ~(L > M) > N / (J v K) > N
3.
1. O v (P v Q)
2. ~(P v Q) / O
3.
1. R * (S v T) / R
2.
1. R > S
2. S > (T v U) / (R > S) * (S > (T v U))
3.
1. W * X / (W * X) v (X * Y)
2.
Two-Step Proofs. Complete the following proofs. They can be done in two steps using the rules from 7.1 and 7.2 of your text. There may be more than one way to do some of the proofs. 14 points.
Example:
1. A
2. A > B
3. B > C / C
4. B 1,2 MP ← You add either version → 4. A > C 2,3 HS
5. C 3,4 MP of lines 4 and 5 5. C 1,4 MP
1. ~C
2. A > B
3. B > C / ~A
1. D > E
2. F > G
3. D v F / E v G
1. A * B / A v C
1. (H v I) > J
2. H / J
1. (H * I) > J
2. H
3. I / J
1. H > (I * J)
2. H / J
1. (K * L) v (M * N)
2. ~(K * L) / N
Proofs with Translation. Translate the following proofs into symbols, using the letters suggested. Each letter should stand for a simple sentence. Then do the proofs. 12 points.
Example:
If we are morally responsible for our actions, we have free will. If we are not morally responsible for our actions, jails should be emptied. We don’t have free will. Therefore, jails should be emptied. (M, F, J)
You write everything that follows:
M = We are morally responsible for our actions
F = We have free will
J = Jails should be emptied.
1. M > F
2. ~M > J
3. ~F / J
4. ~M 1,3 MT
5. J 2,4 MP
1. Either the mind is identical to the brain, or it is immaterial. If the mind is immaterial, it doesn’t make any difference. The mind makes a difference. Therefore, the mind is identical to the brain. (B, I, D)
2. If there is not an afterlife, then all is hopeless. If all is hopeless, despair is the right attitude. Despair is not the right attitude. Therefore, there is an afterlife. (A, H, D)
Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775)  |
Question 1006581: Q∨P
R→~P
R→Q
Here is what I put but I have not been able to pass correctly. Feedback is the proof solution is wrong. Any help would be great.
Solution
1) Q∨P
2) R→~P
3) Q (SIMP 1)
4) P (SIMP 2)
5) R (MP 2, 4)
6) R→Q (HS 3, 5)
Simplifying 1, we derive lines 3 and 4. Line 5 comes about as a natural deduction of line 2 and 4. Using DS rule, we derive line 6 from line 3 and 5.
Click here to see answer by jim_thompson5910(35256) |
|
Older solutions: 1..45, 46..90, 91..135, 136..180, 181..225, 226..270, 271..315, 316..360, 361..405, 406..450, 451..495, 496..540, 541..585, 586..630, 631..675, 676..720, 721..765, 766..810, 811..855, 856..900, 901..945, 946..990, 991..1035, 1036..1080, 1081..1125, 1126..1170, 1171..1215, 1216..1260, 1261..1305, 1306..1350, 1351..1395, 1396..1440, 1441..1485
|