Questions on Logic: Proofs answered by real tutors!

Algebra ->  Proofs -> Questions on Logic: Proofs answered by real tutors!      Log On


   



Tutors Answer Your Questions about Proofs (FREE)


Question 1171045: Create a poof for the following argument
1. (L ∨ B) ⊃ C
2. (S ∨ D) • L / C

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171296: Construct a proof for the following:
1. ~C
2. (~A * B) v (~A * C). .·. B

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171295: Construct a proof for the following:
1. ~(J * L)
2. (J --> ~L) --> (~M * ~X)
3. E v (M v X). .·. E

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171292: Prove the following:
1. O --> (H * M)
2. (O --> G) --> (H --> ~M)
3. ~G --> (~H v ~M) .·. H --> ~M

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171728: 1. J => (L v T) Basic Assumption
2. ~ (L v ~ J) Basic Assumption / ~ L => T

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171730: 1. (E & I) v (M & U) Basic Assumption
2. ~ E Basic Assumption / ~ M => ~ U


Click here to see answer by Solver92311(821) About Me 

Question 1171801: I am trying to use indirect proof to derive the conclusion but I am confused on the steps to get to ~A.
1. (A & B) ⊃C
2. B & ~C/~A


Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171806: 1. W ⊃ (P v C)
2. ~P
3. W/C
I am trying to see how they were able to get the conclusion "C"
I think it should be
4. C modus ponens 1,2
But I am not sure if that is correct or if i am on the wrong path.

Click here to see answer by math_tutor2020(3816) About Me 

Question 1171807: 1. (J v F) v M
2. (J v M) ⊃ ~ P
3. ~F/~(F v P)
4. M Assumption for Indirect Proof
5.

12. ~(F v P)
I think there are 12 lines to get to the conclusion?

Click here to see answer by math_tutor2020(3816) About Me 

Question 1171842: 1. T ⊃ O
2. R v ~O
3. ~R/~T
4. ~T DS 2,3
I think I completed this correctly but I may be missing a step

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171839: [(P ⊃ Q) & P] ⊃ Q
I need to use premise free proof to prove the equation above but I am at a lost on where to start

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171838: 1. A v B
2. A ≡ (C & D)
3. B ⊃ (D & G)/D
I know I need to use indirect proof to derive the conclusion but I am thrown off by the ≡ symbol as we rarely have used that symbol

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171851: 1. (Q ⊃~J) ⊃ (M ⊃~D)
2. Q ⊃M
3. M ⊃ ~J/Q ⊃ ~D
I am at a complete lost with this one. I believe we are gong to use motus ponens and possibly MT as well

Click here to see answer by math_tutor2020(3816) About Me 
Question 1171851: 1. (Q ⊃~J) ⊃ (M ⊃~D)
2. Q ⊃M
3. M ⊃ ~J/Q ⊃ ~D
I am at a complete lost with this one. I believe we are gong to use motus ponens and possibly MT as well

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171852: 1. T ⊃ (Q & F)
2. T & C/Q v O
I am trying to solve this equation using the inference rules and replacement rules.
I don't think an indirect proof is needed to derive the conclusion

Click here to see answer by math_tutor2020(3816) About Me 

Question 1171859: 1. F ⊃ ~U
2. ~F ⊃ P
3. F v ~F/~U v P
I think what is throwing me off with this equation is the use of the two F's in line 3.

Click here to see answer by math_tutor2020(3816) About Me 

Question 1171795: Use the inference rules, replacement rules, indirect proof, or conditional proof to derive the conclusion.
1. (Q ⊃ ~J) ⊃ (M ⊃ ~D)
2. Q ⊃ M
3. M ⊃ ~J/Q ⊃ ~D
I am at a complete lost with this equation

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171858: 1) (Q ⊃~J) ⊃ (M ⊃~D)
2) Q ⊃M
3) M ⊃ ~J/Q ⊃ ~D
I am trying to figure out how the conclusion came to be Q ⊃ ~D.

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171796: Use a premise-free proof to prove: [(P ⊃ Q) & P] ⊃ Q
Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171792: 1. A v B
2. A ≡ (C & D)
3. B ⊃ (D & G)/D
I am trying to solve this equation. i do know that I need to use an indirect proof but I am stuck.

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171915: If the radius is 5 cm, find the SA and volume of the sphere
Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1171729: 1. ~ A v ~ S Basic Assumption
2. ~ ~ S Basic Assumption
3. (A => ~ O) & (~ O => A) Basic Assumption
4. (~ O => ~ S) v A Basic Assumption / A => ~ S



Click here to see answer by mccravyedwin(406) About Me 

Question 1171802: use the inference rules, replacement rules, indirect proof and/or conditional proof to derive the conclusion.
1. F ⊃ ~U
2. ~F ⊃ P
3. F v ~F/~U v P

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171800: use the inference rules, replacement rules, indirect proof and/or conditional proof to derive the conclusion.
1. T ⊃ (Q & F)
2. T & C/Q v O

Click here to see answer by mccravyedwin(406) About Me 
Question 1171800: use the inference rules, replacement rules, indirect proof and/or conditional proof to derive the conclusion.
1. T ⊃ (Q & F)
2. T & C/Q v O

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171799: Use the inference rules to derive the conclusion
1. T ⊃ O
2. R v ~O
3. ~R/~T

Click here to see answer by Plocharczyk(17) About Me 
Question 1171799: Use the inference rules to derive the conclusion
1. T ⊃ O
2. R v ~O
3. ~R/~T

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171798: I need to use proofs to derive the conclusion but I am not sure if I should use MP, or DS
1. (Q ⊃~J) ⊃ (M ⊃~D)
2. Q ⊃M
3. M ⊃ ~J/Q ⊃ ~D

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1171793: 1. (J v F) v M
2. (J v M) ⊃ ~P
3. ~F/~(F v P)
I need help tryin to figure out what inference rules to use to solve this problem

Click here to see answer by Solver92311(821) About Me 

Question 1171516: Could you please help me with this problem?
A → B, A ⋁ C, B → D, ¬C ⊢ E ⋁ D
I need to construct a formal proof.
Thank you!

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1171518: For any TFL sentences 𝛼, 𝛽, and 𝛾 such that 𝛼 is a contradiction, 𝛽 is a tautology, and 𝛾 is neither a contradiction nor a tautology, do the following entailments hold:
3.2.1. 𝛼 → 𝛼 ⊨ 𝛽 → (𝛽 → 𝛼)
3.2.2. ¬(𝛽 → 𝛾) ⊨ 𝛾 ↔ 𝛼
Thank you!

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1176033: Derive the base-to-height ratio equation from lecture 11:
B/H' = (1-PE/100)d/f
Use similar triangle relationships, starting with G/H' = d/f. Symbol definitions are given in the PPT, the figure will be helpful.

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1176890: Proof by induction. Imagine that we are going to prove by induction that:
(1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + (1/sqrt(3)) + ... + (1/sqrt(n)) >= sqrt(n), for all n E Z^+
Assume by the inductive step that:
(1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + (1/sqrt(3)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k), for some k E Z^+
Which of the following is a correct way of ending this proof?
a. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) = sqrt(k+1) +1 >= sqrt(k+1)
b. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k+1) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k+1)
c. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) = (sqrt(k)sqrt(k+1)+1)/sqrt(k+1)) >= (sqrt(k)sqrt(k)+1)/sqrt(k+1)) >= ((k+1)/sqrt(k+1)) = sqrt(k+1)
d. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k)) = ((sqrt(k)sqrt(k+1))/sqrt(k)) >= ((k+1)/(sqrt(k+1))) = sqrt(k+1)

Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1176891: (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + (1/sqrt(3)) + ... + (1/sqrt(n)) >= sqrt(n), for all n E Z^+

Assume by the inductive step that:

(1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + (1/sqrt(3)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k), for some k E Z^+

Which of the following is a correct way of ending this proof?

a. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) = sqrt(k+1) +1 >= sqrt(k+1)

b. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k)) >= sqrt(k+1) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k+1)

c. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k+1)) = (sqrt(k)sqrt(k+1)+1)/sqrt(k+1)) >= (sqrt(k)sqrt(k)+1)/sqrt(k+1)) >= ((k+1)/sqrt(k+1)) = sqrt(k+1)

d. (1/sqrt(1)) + (1/sqrt(2)) + ... + (1/sqrt(k+1)) >= sqrt(k) + (1/sqrt(k)) = ((sqrt(k)sqrt(k+1))/sqrt(k)) >= ((k+1)/(sqrt(k+1))) = sqrt(k+1)

Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1177235: Conditional proof
M->(K->L)
(L\/N) -> J
Therefore, M-> (K->J)
That's supposed to be a downward arrow between L and N in the second line

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1177233: (O->R) -> S
(P->R) ~S
Therefore, ~R

Click here to see answer by Solver92311(821) About Me 

Question 1178037: 1.In a certain class of 40 students,28 were listed as an exercise book reader, and 16 as book reader while 8 were listed as exercise book and book readers. Then find out how many students read neither exercise book nor book.
Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1178231: Prove or disprove: There exists an integer a for which 20a ≡ 2 mod 8.
Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1178624: Use Indirect proof to solve the following:
B ≡ (A • D)
~A ⊃ (~B ⊃ C) / A ∨ C

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1179155: Prove that there exists some integer n such that n^2 + 123457 is a perfect square.
Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1179120: 1. ~(K v F)
2. ~F ⊃ (K v C)
3. (G v C) ⊃ ~H / ~(K v H)

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1179159: Let A = {n C Z | n is odd} and B = {n C Z | n^2 - 1 mod 4}. Prove that A is included in B.
Click here to see answer by ikleyn(52775) About Me 

Question 1179180: Question 1
1. ~(U v R)
2. (~R v N) ⊃ (P * H)
3. Q ⊃ ~H ~Q
Question 2
1. (P v U) ⊃ ~L
2. (I v W) ⊃ ~K
3. L • K / ~(U v W)
Question 3
1. R ⊃ (C v M)
2 ~(I v C)
3. ~(A v M) / ~R
could you possibly explain how you got the answer??

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me 

Question 1179186: 1. ~(U v R)
2. (~R v N) ⊃ (P * H)
3. Q ⊃ ~H / ~Q

Click here to see answer by math_helper(2461) About Me 

Question 1178950: Use the first five rules of replacement (DM,Com, Assoc, Dist, DN) together with the eight rules of implication to prove this argument is valid.
1. H ⊃ ~A
2. A /~(H v ~A)

Click here to see answer by Edwin McCravy(20054) About Me