SOLUTION: Add the missing rule citations for these proofs: 1.(F → (G → ¬H))PR 2.((F ∧ ¬W) → (G ∨ T))PR 3.(F ∧ ¬T)PR 4.(W → T)PR 5.F 6.¬T 7.(G → ¬H) 8.W 9.T 10

Algebra ->  Proofs -> SOLUTION: Add the missing rule citations for these proofs: 1.(F → (G → ¬H))PR 2.((F ∧ ¬W) → (G ∨ T))PR 3.(F ∧ ¬T)PR 4.(W → T)PR 5.F 6.¬T 7.(G → ¬H) 8.W 9.T 10      Log On


   



Question 1208837: Add the missing rule citations for these proofs:
1.(F → (G → ¬H))PR
2.((F ∧ ¬W) → (G ∨ T))PR
3.(F ∧ ¬T)PR
4.(W → T)PR
5.F
6.¬T
7.(G → ¬H)
8.W
9.T
10.⊥
11.¬W
12.(F ∧ ¬W)
13.(G ∨ T)
14.G
15.¬H
17.T
18.⊥
19.¬H
20.¬H

Answer by ikleyn(52778) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.

See this link to/from/on AI (= artificial intelligence)

https://www.google.com/search?q=Add+the+missing+rule+citations+for+these+proofs%3A+1.(F+%E2%86%92+(G+%E2%86%92+%C2%ACH))PR+2.((F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACW)+%E2%86%92+(G+%E2%88%A8+T))PR+3.(F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACT)PR+4.(W+%E2%86%92+T)PR+5.F+6.%C2%ACT+7.(G+%E2%86%92+%C2%ACH)+8.W+9.T+10.%E2%8A%A5+11.%C2%ACW+12.(F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACW)+13.(G+%E2%88%A8+T)+14.G+15.%C2%ACH+17.T+18.%E2%8A%A5+19.%C2%ACH+20.%C2%ACH&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS1071US1071&oq=Add+the+missing+rule+citations+for+these+proofs%3A+1.(F+%E2%86%92+(G+%E2%86%92+%C2%ACH))PR+2.((F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACW)+%E2%86%92+(G+%E2%88%A8+T))PR+3.(F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACT)PR+4.(W+%E2%86%92+T)PR+5.F+6.%C2%ACT+7.(G+%E2%86%92+%C2%ACH)+8.W+9.T+10.%E2%8A%A5+11.%C2%ACW+12.(F+%E2%88%A7+%C2%ACW)+13.(G+%E2%88%A8+T)+14.G+15.%C2%ACH+17.T+18.%E2%8A%A5+19.%C2%ACH+20.%C2%ACH&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTIzMjVqMGoxNagCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


When you need to learn on how many is 2 x 2, the best and the fastest way is to ask AI.

A question still will remain opened - what will you learn from it and what knowledge will you gain after it.