Create proof for the following argument
1. (H ∨ M) ∨ L
2. L ⊃ H
3. H ⊃ (M ⊃ H)
4. ∼(M ⊃ H) /M
5. ~(~M ∨ H) 4, material implication
6. ~~M • ~H 5, deMorgan's law
7. M • ~H 6, double negation
8. M 7, simplification
Notice that in this argument, we did not need to use the first three
premises but only the fourth.
Edwin